Literature DB >> 11467425

Moth hearing in response to bat echolocation calls manipulated independently in time and frequency.

G Jones1, D A Waters.   

Abstract

We measured the auditory responses of the noctuid moth Noctua pronuba to bat echolocation calls which were manipulated independently in time and frequency. Such manipulations are important in understanding how insect hearing influences the evolution of echolocation call characteristics. We manipulated the calls of three bat species (Rhinolophus hipposideros, Myotis nattereri and Pipistrellus pipistrellus) that use different echolocation call features by doubling their duration or reducing their frequency, and measured the auditory thresholds from the A1 cells of the moths. Knowing the auditory responses of the moth we tested three predictions. (i) The ranking of the audibility of unmanipulated calls to the moths should be predictable from their temporal and/or frequency structure. This was supported. (ii) Doubling the duration of the calls should increase their audibility by ca. 3 dB for all species. Their audibility did indeed increase by 2.1-3.5 dB. (iii) Reducing the frequency of the calls would increase their audibility for all species. Reducing the frequency had small effects for the two bat species which used short duration (2.7-3.6 ms) calls. However, the relatively long-duration (50 ms), largely constant-frequency calls of R. hipposideros increased in audibility by 21.6 dB when their frequency was halved. Time and frequency changes influence the audibility of calls to tympanate moths in different ways according to call design. Large changes in frequency and time had relatively small changes on the audibility of calls for short, largely broadband calls. Channelling energy into the second harmonic of the call substantially decreased the audibility of calls for bats which use long-duration, constant-frequency components in echolocation calls. We discuss our findings in the contexts of the evolution of both bat echolocation call design and the potential responses of insects which hear ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11467425      PMCID: PMC1690724          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  10 in total

1.  Tympanal hearing in insects.

Authors:  R R Hoy; D Robert
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Normal hearing thresholds for clicks.

Authors:  D R Stapells; T W Picton; A D Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The peripheral auditory characteristics of noctuid moths: information encoding and endogenous noise

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Bimodal echolocation in pipistrelle bats: are cryptic species present?

Authors:  G Jones; S M van Parijs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1993-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Low-frequency echolocation enables the bat Tadarida teniotis to feed on tympanate insects.

Authors:  J Rydell; R Arlettaz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Scaling of echolocation call parameters in bats.

Authors:  G Jones
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  The gleaning attacks of the northern long-eared bat, Myotis septentrionalis, are relatively inaudible to moths.

Authors:  P A Faure; J H Fullard; J W Dawson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  The peripheral auditory characteristics of noctuid moths: responses to the search-phase echolocation calls of bats

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  The echolocation calls of the spotted bat Euderma maculatum are relatively inaudible to moths

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Echolocation call structure and intensity in five species of insectivorous bats.

Authors:  D A Waters; G Jones
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.312

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  The relative influence of competition and prey defences on the trophic structure of animalivorous bat ensembles.

Authors:  M Corrie Schoeman; David S Jacobs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Sensory ecology of predator-prey interactions: responses of the AN2 interneuron in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus to the echolocation calls of sympatric bats.

Authors:  James H Fullard; John M Ratcliffe; Cassandra Guignion
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.