Literature DB >> 11459956

Topological challenges to DNA replication: conformations at the fork.

L Postow1, N J Crisona, B J Peter, C D Hardy, N R Cozzarelli.   

Abstract

The unwinding of the parental DNA duplex during replication causes a positive linking number difference, or superhelical strain, to build up around the elongating replication fork. The branching at the fork and this strain bring about different conformations from that of (-) supercoiled DNA that is not being replicated. The replicating DNA can form (+) precatenanes, in which the daughter DNAs are intertwined, and (+) supercoils. Topoisomerases have the essential role of relieving the superhelical strain by removing these structures. Stalled replication forks of molecules with a (+) superhelical strain have the additional option of regressing, forming a four-way junction at the replication fork. This four-way junction can be acted on by recombination enzymes to restart replication. Replication and chromosome folding are made easier by topological domain barriers, which sequester the substrates for topoisomerases into defined and concentrated regions. Domain barriers also allow replicated DNA to be (-) supercoiled. We discuss the importance of replicating DNA conformations and the roles of topoisomerases, focusing on recent work from our laboratory.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11459956      PMCID: PMC37424          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.111006998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  71 in total

1.  Modulation of RNA polymerase by (p)ppGpp reveals a RecG-dependent mechanism for replication fork progression.

Authors:  P McGlynn; R G Lloyd
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-31       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Positive torsional strain causes the formation of a four-way junction at replication forks.

Authors:  L Postow; C Ullsperger; R W Keller; C Bustamante; A V Vologodskii; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-10-30       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The role of topoisomerase IV in partitioning bacterial replicons and the structure of catenated intermediates in DNA replication.

Authors:  D E Adams; E M Shekhtman; E L Zechiedrich; M B Schmid; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-10-16       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Simplification of DNA topology below equilibrium values by type II topoisomerases.

Authors:  V V Rybenkov; C Ullsperger; A V Vologodskii; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Isolation and characterisation of a strain carrying a conditional lethal mutation in the cou gene of Escherichia coli K12.

Authors:  E Orr; N F Fairweather; I B Holland; R H Pritchard
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1979

6.  Discovery of a predicted DNA knot substantiates a model for site-specific recombination.

Authors:  S A Wasserman; J M Dungan; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-07-12       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Chromosomal loop anchorage of the kappa immunoglobulin gene occurs next to the enhancer in a region containing topoisomerase II sites.

Authors:  P N Cockerill; W T Garrard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Transposon-mediated site-specific recombination: a defined in vitro system.

Authors:  R R Reed
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Processive recombination by the phage Mu Gin system: implications for the mechanisms of DNA strand exchange, DNA site alignment, and enhancer action.

Authors:  R Kanaar; A Klippel; E Shekhtman; J M Dungan; R Kahmann; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-07-27       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Chromosomal supercoiling in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  W G Miller; R W Simons
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.501

View more
  111 in total

1.  Decatenation of DNA circles by FtsK-dependent Xer site-specific recombination.

Authors:  Stephen C Y Ip; Migena Bregu; François-Xavier Barre; David J Sherratt
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Single-molecule study of DNA unlinking by eukaryotic and prokaryotic type-II topoisomerases.

Authors:  G Charvin; D Bensimon; V Croquette
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Rapid and sequential movement of individual chromosomal loci to specific subcellular locations during bacterial DNA replication.

Authors:  Patrick H Viollier; Martin Thanbichler; Patrick T McGrath; Lisandra West; Maliwan Meewan; Harley H McAdams; Lucy Shapiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Disentangling DNA during replication: a tale of two strands.

Authors:  Christine D Hardy; Nancy J Crisona; Michael D Stone; Nicholas R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Recombination and chromosome segregation.

Authors:  David J Sherratt; Britta Søballe; François-Xavier Barre; Sergio Filipe; Ivy Lau; Thomas Massey; James Yates
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  A topological view of the replicon.

Authors:  Jorge B Schvartzman; Andrzej Stasiak
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Fork rotation and DNA precatenation are restricted during DNA replication to prevent chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Stephanie A Schalbetter; Sahar Mansoubi; Anna L Chambers; Jessica A Downs; Jonathan Baxter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mcl1p is a polymerase alpha replication accessory factor important for S-phase DNA damage survival.

Authors:  Dewight R Williams; J R McIntosh
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2005-01

9.  The geometry of DNA supercoils modulates topoisomerase-mediated DNA cleavage and enzyme response to anticancer drugs.

Authors:  A Kathleen McClendon; Neil Osheroff
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Topological locking restrains replication fork reversal.

Authors:  Marta Fierro-Fernández; Pablo Hernández; Dora B Krimer; Andrzej Stasiak; Jorge B Schvartzman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.