Literature DB >> 15065655

Disentangling DNA during replication: a tale of two strands.

Christine D Hardy1, Nancy J Crisona, Michael D Stone, Nicholas R Cozzarelli.   

Abstract

The seminal papers by Watson and Crick in 1953 on the structure and function of DNA clearly enunciated the challenge their model presented of how the intertwined strands of DNA are unwound and separated for replication to occur. We first give a historical overview of the major discoveries in the past 50 years that address this challenge. We then describe in more detail the cellular mechanisms responsible for the unlinking of DNA. No single strategy on its own accounts for the complete unlinking of chromosomes required for DNA segregation to proceed. Rather, it is the combined effects of topoisomerase action, chromosome organization and DNA-condensing proteins that allow the successful partitioning of chromosomes into dividing cells. Finally, we propose a model of chromosome structure, consistent with recent findings, that explains how the problem of unlinking is alleviated by the division of chromosomal DNA into manageably sized domains.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15065655      PMCID: PMC1693293          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  44 in total

Review 1.  Sex in the wormcounting and compensating X-chromosome dose.

Authors:  B J Meyer
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  Review: SMCs in the world of chromosome biology- from prokaryotes to higher eukaryotes.

Authors:  N Cobbe; M M Heck
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.867

3.  Mutual suppression of mukB and seqA phenotypes might arise from their opposing influences on the Escherichia coli nucleoid structure.

Authors:  T Weitao; K Nordström; S Dasgupta
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Suppression of chromosome segregation defects of Escherichia coli muk mutants by mutations in topoisomerase I.

Authors:  J A Sawitzke; S Austin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Topological challenges to DNA replication: conformations at the fork.

Authors:  L Postow; N J Crisona; B J Peter; C D Hardy; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The ABCs of SMC proteins: two-armed ATPases for chromosome condensation, cohesion, and repair.

Authors:  Tatsuya Hirano
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 7.  Shaping the metaphase chromosome: coordination of cohesion and condensation.

Authors:  A Losada; T Hirano
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Different localization of SeqA-bound nascent DNA clusters and MukF-MukE-MukB complex in Escherichia coli cells.

Authors:  K Ohsumi; M Yamazoe; S Hiraga
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 9.  An analysis of the factory model for chromosome replication and segregation in bacteria.

Authors:  J Sawitzke; S Austin
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  Structural maintenance of chromosomes protein of Bacillus subtilis affects supercoiling in vivo.

Authors:  Janet C Lindow; Robert A Britton; Alan D Grossman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Linear ordering and dynamic segregation of the bacterial chromosome.

Authors:  Adam M Breier; Nicholas R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Local geometry and elasticity in compact chromatin structure.

Authors:  Elena F Koslover; Colin J Fuller; Aaron F Straight; Andrew J Spakowitz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  An algebraic view of bacterial genome evolution.

Authors:  Andrew R Francis
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Structural basis for the MukB-topoisomerase IV interaction and its functional implications in vivo.

Authors:  Seychelle M Vos; Nichole K Stewart; Martha G Oakley; James M Berger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  SUMO modification of DNA topoisomerase II: trying to get a CENse of it all.

Authors:  Ming-Ta Lee; Jeff Bachant
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-02-20

6.  DNA slippage occurs at microsatellite loci without minimal threshold length in humans: a comparative genomic approach.

Authors:  Sébastien Leclercq; Eric Rivals; Philippe Jarne
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Loop-closure kinetics reveal a stable, right-handed DNA intermediate in Cre recombination.

Authors:  Massa J Shoura; Stefan M Giovan; Alexandre A Vetcher; Riccardo Ziraldo; Andreas Hanke; Stephen D Levene
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Supercoiling, R-loops, Replication and the Functions of Bacterial Type 1A Topoisomerases.

Authors:  Julien Brochu; Émilie-Vlachos Breton; Marc Drolet
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  The hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakarensis is resistant to pervasive negative supercoiling activity of DNA gyrase.

Authors:  Paul Villain; Violette da Cunha; Etienne Villain; Patrick Forterre; Jacques Oberto; Ryan Catchpole; Tamara Basta
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  DNA catenation maintains structure of human metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  David L V Bauer; Rodolphe Marie; Kristian H Rasmussen; Anders Kristensen; Kalim U Mir
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.