Literature DB >> 11459897

Can item response theory reduce patient burden when measuring health status in neurological disorders? Results from Rasch analysis of the SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10).

C Jenkinson1, R Fitzpatrick, A Garratt, V Peto, S Stewart-Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indices of physical function may have a hierarchy of items. In cases where this can be demonstrated it may be possible to reduce patient burden by asking them to complete only those items which relate directly to their own level of ability.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether statistical procedures, operationalising what is known as item response theory (IRT), can be used to assess the unidimensionality of the 10 item physical functioning domain of the SF-36 in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor neuron disease, and, secondly, to determine whether it would be possible to administer subsets of items to certain patients, on the basis of their replies to other items in the scale, thereby reducing patient burden.
METHODS: Rasch analysis, a form of IRT methodology, of the 10 item physical functioning domain (PF-10) in two neurological patient samples was undertaken and the results compared with results of a Rasch analysis of data gained from a population survey (the third Oxford healthy lifestyles survey).
RESULTS: Evidence from the analyses suggests that the PF-10 does not form a perfect hierarchy on a unidimensional scale. However, certain items seem to form a hierarchy, and responses to some of them are contingent on responses to the other items.
CONCLUSIONS: Rasch analysis of the PF-10 in neurological patients has indicated that certain items of the scale are hierarchically ordered, and consequently not all respondents would need to complete them all: indeed those most severely ill would be required to complete less items than those with only limited disabilities. The implications of this are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11459897      PMCID: PMC1737514          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.71.2.220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; S Stewart-Brown; S Petersen; C Paice
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Applying psychometric criteria to functional assessment in medical rehabilitation: I. Exploring unidimensionality.

Authors:  B Silverstein; K M Kilgore; W P Fisher; J P Harley; R F Harvey
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Self-reported functioning and well-being in patients with Parkinson's disease: comparison of the short-form health survey (SF-36) and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)

Authors:  C Jenkinson; V Peto; R Fitzpatrick; R Greenhall; N Hyman
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 10.668

4.  Reduced item set for the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis assessment questionnaire: development and validation of the ALSAQ-5.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I. Unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch item scale.

Authors:  S M Haley; C A McHorney; J E Ware
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.437

  5 in total
  17 in total

1.  Unidimensionality and reliability under Mokken scaling of the Dutch language version of the SF-36.

Authors:  P G M van der Heijden; S van Buuren; M Fekkes; J Radder; E Verrips
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Clinician's Commentary on Dang et al.(1).

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  [Item response theory and its application in neurology. Measurement of activity limitations in neurologic patients].

Authors:  S Gauggel; M Böcker; P Zimmermann; C Privou; D Lutz
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Development and validation of a computer adaptive test for measuring dyspnea in heart failure.

Authors:  Bernice Ruo; Seung W Choi; David W Baker; Kathleen L Grady; David Cella
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 5.712

5.  Examining unidimensionality and improving reliability for the eight subscales of the SF-36 in opioid-dependent patients using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Yu Hsiao; Ching-Lin Shih; Wan-Hui Yu; Cheng-Hsi Hsieh; Ching-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Response.

Authors:  Henrica de Vet; Herman J Adér; Caroline B Terwee; François Pouwer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  An assessment of the feasibility and utility of the MS symptom and impact diary (MSSID).

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  The responsiveness of headache impact scales scored using 'classical' and 'modern' psychometric methods: a re-analysis of three clinical trials.

Authors:  M Kosinski; J B Bjorner; J E Ware; A Batenhorst; R K Cady
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Factors associated with incomplete DASH questionnaires.

Authors:  Arjan G J Bot; Steven Ferree; Valentin Neuhaus; David Ring
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2013-03

10.  Comparing the impact of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis on quality of life: co-calibration of the PSORIQoL and QoLIAD.

Authors:  J Twiss; S P McKenna
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.