Literature DB >> 1859255

Applying psychometric criteria to functional assessment in medical rehabilitation: I. Exploring unidimensionality.

B Silverstein1, K M Kilgore, W P Fisher, J P Harley, R F Harvey.   

Abstract

While rehabilitation providers are facing increasing pressure to document treatment outcomes, critics have warned against the inappropriate use of ordinal functional assessment data in arithmetic operations. Two salient criticisms concern the combination of items representing multidimensional abilities into a single total score, and the indeterminate distances between hierarchical functional assessment scale categories. In this initial study, the factor structure of the Patient Evaluation and Conference System (PECS) was studied to assess the potential for unidimensional measurement. Factor analysis of a multidiagnostic dataset (n = 3,564) yielded eight factors accounting for 60% of the variance among 68 PECS items. The factors indicate that several unidimensional measures may underlie the PECS. These factors are delineated, and further studies of unidimensionality and additivity are recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1859255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  6 in total

1.  Measurement qualities of a self-report and therapist-scored functional capacity instrument based on the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

Authors:  Craig A Velozo; Bongsam Choi; Sheryl Eckberg Zylstra; Rochelle Santopoalo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-03

2.  Can item response theory reduce patient burden when measuring health status in neurological disorders? Results from Rasch analysis of the SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10).

Authors:  C Jenkinson; R Fitzpatrick; A Garratt; V Peto; S Stewart-Brown
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario MacMaster questionnaire (WOMAC) in 2205 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia.

Authors:  F Wolfe; S X Kong
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Translation, adaptation and validation of the American short form Patient Activation Measure (PAM13) in a Danish version.

Authors:  Helle Terkildsen Maindal; Ineta Sokolowski; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Validation of the patient activation measure in patients at discharge from hospitals and at distance from hospital care in Sweden.

Authors:  Amanda Hellström; Mesfin Kassaye Tessma; Maria Flink; Anna Dahlgren; Kristina Schildmeijer; Mirjam Ekstedt
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Reliability and Validity of the Patient Activation Measure in Kidney Disease: Results of Rasch Analysis.

Authors:  Courtney J Lightfoot; Thomas J Wilkinson; Katherine E Memory; Jared Palmer; Alice C Smith
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 10.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.