Literature DB >> 10326053

Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom.

C Jenkinson1, S Stewart-Brown, S Petersen, C Paice.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To introduce the UK SF36 Version II (SF36-II), and to (a) gain population norms for the UK SF36-II in a large community sample as well as to explore the instrument's internal consistency reliability and construct validity, and (b) to derive the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) algorithms for the UK SF36-II.
DESIGN: Postal survey using a questionnaire booklet, containing the SF-36-II and questions on demographics and long term illness.
SETTING: The sample was drawn from General Practitioner Records held by the Health Authorities for Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Northamptonshire, and Oxfordshire. SAMPLE: The questionnaire was sent to 13,800 randomly selected subjects between the ages of 18-64 inclusive. OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores for the eight dimensions of the UK SF36-II and the PCS and MCS summary scores.
RESULTS: The survey achieved a response rate of 64.4% (n = 8889). Internal consistency of the different dimensions of the questionnaire were found to be high. Normative data for the SF-36 are reported, broken down by age and sex, and social class. Factor analysis of the eight domains produced a two factor solution and provided weights for the UK SF36-II.
CONCLUSION: The SF36-II domains were shown to have improved reliability over the previous version of the UK SF36. Furthermore, enhancements to wording and response categories reduces the extent of floor and ceiling effects in the role performance dimensions. These advances are likely to lead to better precision as well as greater responsiveness in longitudinal studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10326053      PMCID: PMC1756775          DOI: 10.1136/jech.53.1.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  6 in total

1.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Development and testing of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey summary scale scores in the United Kingdom. Results from a large-scale survey and a clinical trial.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; R Layte; K Lawrence
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  J E Ware; M Kosinski; M S Bayliss; C A McHorney; W H Rogers; A Raczek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Evaluating the efficacy of medical treatment: possibilities and limitations.

Authors:  C Jenkinson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; A Coulter; L Wright
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-29

6.  The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS?

Authors:  A M Garratt; D A Ruta; M I Abdalla; J K Buckingham; I T Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-29
  6 in total
  143 in total

1.  The Canadian SF-36 health survey: normative data add to its value.

Authors:  S Wood-Dauphinee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Evaluation of the health effects of a neighbourhood traffic calming scheme.

Authors:  David S Morrison; Hilary Thomson; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Performance of the Swedish SF-36 version 2.0.

Authors:  Charles Taft; Jan Karlsson; Marianne Sullivan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Thoracoscopy and talc poudrage compared with intercostal drainage and talc slurry infusion to manage malignant pleural effusion: the TAPPS RCT.

Authors:  Rahul Bhatnagar; Ramon Luengo-Fernandez; Brennan C Kahan; Najib M Rahman; Robert F Miller; Nick A Maskell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  The health-related utility and health-related quality of life of hospital-treated subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes with particular reference to differing severity of peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  C J Currie; C D Poole; A Woehl; C Ll Morgan; S Cawley; M D Rousculp; M T Covington; J R Peters
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Randomised crossover study of pressure and volume non-invasive ventilation in chest wall deformity.

Authors:  J M Tuggey; M W Elliott
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 7.  Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36.

Authors:  Henrica C W de Vet; Herman J Adèr; Caroline B Terwee; François Pouwer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  The psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the SF-36 health survey in patients with myocardial infarction in mainland China.

Authors:  Wenru Wang; Violeta Lopez; Chair Sek Ying; David R Thompson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Patient assessments of a hypothetical medical error: effects of health outcome, disclosure, and staff responsiveness.

Authors:  A Cleopas; A Villaveces; A Charvet; P A Bovier; V Kolly; T V Perneger
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-04

10.  Patient assessments of the most important medical decision during a hospitalization.

Authors:  Thomas V Perneger; Agathe Charvet-Bérard; Arnaud Perrier
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.