Literature DB >> 11458208

Progression difference between cancers of the larynx and hypopharynx is not due to tumor size and vascularization.

J Lukits1, J Timár, A Juhász, B Döme, S Paku, G Répássy.   

Abstract

A recent survey of head and neck cancer indicated a sharp difference in survival between cancer of the hypopharynx and cancers formed in other head and neck sites. We have analyzed tumor size relative to clinical stage and vascularization as possible causes for such a difference in a series of 21 patients with cancer of the laryngopharynx (11 glottic and 10 hypopharyngeal). We found that the volume of the smallest cancers of the larynx at stage 2 is significantly larger than the volume of the cancers of the hypopharynx at stage 4 (P < 0.05). Next, we have determined by immunohistochemistry and morphometry the microvessel density, microvessel perimeter, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression of laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancers. Analysis of these data indicates that there is no difference in vascularization and VEGF expression between these two tumor types. These data strongly suggest that the invasive but not the angiogenic phenotype of hypopharyngeal cancer cells could be responsible for the more aggressive biologic behavior of this head and neck cancer subtype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11458208     DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2001.116187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  7 in total

1.  Differential biomarker expression in head and neck cancer correlates with anatomical localization.

Authors:  László Tamás; Gabriella Szentkúti; Mónika Eros; Kornél Dános; Diána Brauswetter; Béla Szende; Ivett Zsákovics; Tibor Krenács
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  The role of tumor size and patient's age as prognostic factors in laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  K Markou; J Goudakos; S Triaridis; J Konstantinidis; V Vital; A Nikolaou
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  Does primary tumour volumetry performed early in the course of definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma improve prediction of primary site outcome?

Authors:  K S S Bhatia; A D King; K-H Yu; A C Vlantis; G Mk Tse; F Kf Mo; A T Ahuja
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Use of combination proteomic analysis to demonstrate molecular similarity of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma arising from different subsites.

Authors:  Paul M Weinberger; Mark Merkley; Jeffrey R Lee; Bao-Ling Adam; Christine G Gourin; Robert H Podolsky; Bruce G Haffty; Evangelia Papadavid; Clarence Sasaki; Amanda Psyrri; William S Dynan
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-07

5.  Expression of hypoxic signaling markers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Hyo Geun Choi; Jin-Soo Kim; Ki Hwan Kim; Kwang Hyun Kim; Myung-Whun Sung; Ji-Young Choe; Ji Eun Kim; Young Ho Jung
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Size, shape, structure, and direction of angiogenesis in laryngeal tumour development.

Authors:  J Laitakari; V Näyhä; F Stenbäck
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Proteomic analysis of hypopharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma sheds light on differences in survival.

Authors:  Jiajia Liu; Weiming Zhu; Zhexuan Li; Gengming Cai; Juncheng Wang; Qinglai Tang; Christopher A Maroun; Gangcai Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.