Literature DB >> 20965907

Does primary tumour volumetry performed early in the course of definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma improve prediction of primary site outcome?

K S S Bhatia1, A D King, K-H Yu, A C Vlantis, G Mk Tse, F Kf Mo, A T Ahuja.   

Abstract

Although previous studies have documented correlations between pre-treatment or post-treatment primary tumour volumes and local outcome following definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), no study has included and compared tumour volumes during CCRT. We reviewed the MRIs of 69 HNSCC patients treated with a 6 weeks course of CCRT and who underwent successful MRI pre-treatment (n = 69), 2 weeks intra-treatment (n = 48) and 6 weeks post-treatment (n = 61). Primary tumour volumes on MRI at the three time points were calculated and compared for their predictive value for primary site outcome. Volume thresholds optimised to predict failure with the highest accuracy and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. The mean pre-treatment volume was 24.6 cm³ (range, 1.1-187.9 cm³) and the mean follow-up interval was 41 months (range, 12-100 months). 23 primary tumours failed treatment (33%). Volumes before, during and after CCRT were positively associated with local failure (p = 0.015, p = 0.009, p<0.0001). Volume reductions during and after CCRT were negatively associated with local failure (p = 0.021, p = 0.001). Pre-treatment and intra-treatment volume thresholds achieved the highest accuracy and produced intermediate PPVs (51-64%) for predicting local failure. Optimised intra-treatment thresholds did not identify any more treatment failures than the pre-treatment thresholds. By comparison, a 6 weeks post-treatment volume reduction (<35%) achieved 100% PPV for failure, albeit with 26% sensitivity. In conclusion, primary tumour volumetry performed early in CCRT provides minimal additional information compared with pre-treatment volumetry, with respect to predicting post-treatment local failures. Therefore, volumetry during CCRT is unlikely to be useful for guiding individual response-based therapeutic modifications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20965907      PMCID: PMC3473721          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/27631720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  22 in total

1.  Preradiotherapy computed tomography as a predictor of local control in supraglottic carcinoma.

Authors:  A A Mancuso; S K Mukherji; I Schmalfuss; W Mendenhall; J Parsons; F Pameijer; R Hermans; P Kubilis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Progression difference between cancers of the larynx and hypopharynx is not due to tumor size and vascularization.

Authors:  J Lukits; J Timár; A Juhász; B Döme; S Paku; G Répássy
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Reporting results of cancer treatment.

Authors:  A B Miller; B Hoogstraten; M Staquet; A Winkler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose to predict pathologic response after induction chemotherapy and definitive chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A David McCollum; Steven C Burrell; Robert I Haddad; Charles M Norris; Roy B Tishler; Mary Ann Case; Marshall R Posner; Annick D Van den Abbeele
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Correlation of tumor volume with local control in laryngeal carcinoma treated by radiotherapy.

Authors:  R W Gilbert; D Birt; H Shulman; J Freeman; D Jenkin; R MacKenzie; C Smith
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Can pretreatment computed tomography findings predict local control in T3 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic larynx treated with radiotherapy alone?

Authors:  W R Lee; A A Mancuso; E M Saleh; W M Mendenhall; J T Parsons; R R Million
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Prognostic impact of tumor volume in patients with stage III-IVA hypopharyngeal cancer without bulky lymph nodes treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Shang-Wen Chen; Shih-Neng Yang; Ji-An Liang; Fang-Jen Lin; Ming-Hsui Tsai
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Prognostic impact of tumor volumetry in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck carcinoma (non-nasopharyngeal) treated by radiotherapy alone or combined radiochemotherapy in a randomized trial.

Authors:  George A Plataniotis; Maria-Ekaterini Theofanopoulou; Anna Kalogera-Fountzila; Afroditi Haritanti; Elisabeta Ciuleanou; Nicolae Ghilezan; Nikolaos Zamboglou; Athanasios Dimitriadis; Ioannis Sofroniadis; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  The role of post-radiation therapy FDG PET in prediction of necessity for post-radiation therapy neck dissection in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Min Yao; Michael M Graham; Henry T Hoffman; Russell B Smith; Gerry F Funk; Scott M Graham; Kenneth J Dornfeld; Mark Skwarchuk; Yusuf Menda; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Clinical applications of tumor volume measurements for predicting outcome in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract.

Authors:  Suresh K Mukherji; Ilona M Schmalfuss; Jonas Castelijns; Anthony A Mancuso
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Expression of Checkpoint and DNA Repair Genes in Head and Neck Cancer as Possible Predictive Factors.

Authors:  Orsolya Rusz; Margit Pál; Éva Szilágyi; László Rovó; Zoltán Varga; Bernadett Tomisa; Gabriella Fábián; Levente Kovács; Olga Nagy; Petra Mózes; Zita Reisz; László Tiszlavicz; Péter Deák; Zsuzsanna Kahán
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Tumour volumes: Predictors of early treatment response in locally advanced head and neck cancers treated with definitive chemoradiation.

Authors:  Parveen Ahlawat; Sheh Rawat; Anjali Kakria; Manoj Pal; Deepika Chauhan; Sarthak Tandon; Shraddha Jain
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-05-05

3.  Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging kinetics during chemoradiotherapy for human papillomavirus-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: preliminary results from a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Yao Ding; John D Hazle; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Steven J Frank; Brian P Hobbs; Rivka R Colen; G Brandon Gunn; Jihong Wang; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Adam S Garden; Stephen Y Lai; David I Rosenthal; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Lesion regression rate based on RECIST: prediction of treatment outcome in patients with head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy compared with FDG PET-CT.

Authors:  Munetaka Matoba; Hiroyuki Tuji; Yuzo Shimode; Tamaki Kondo; Kiyotaka Oota; Hisao Tonami
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Study of diffusion weighted MRI as a predictive biomarker of response during radiotherapy for high and intermediate risk squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx: The MeRInO study.

Authors:  C Paterson; S Allwood-Spiers; I McCrea; J Foster; M McJury; M Thomson; M Sankaralingam; D Grose; A James; M Rizwanullah; P McLoone; A Chalmers; A Duffton
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-10

Review 6.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging techniques for treatment response evaluation in patients with head and neck tumors, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anouk van der Hoorn; Peter Jan van Laar; Gea A Holtman; Henriette E Westerlaan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Radiomic Analysis of Tumour Heterogeneity Using MRI in Head and Neck Cancer Following Chemoradiotherapy: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Amrita Guha; Mustafa Anjari; Gary Cook; Vicky Goh; Steve Connor
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Current oncologic concepts and emerging techniques for imaging of head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Maliha Sadick; Stefan O Schoenberg; Karl Hoermann; Haneen Sadick
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-12-20

Review 9.  The role of tumor volume in radiotherapy of patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Tomasz Rutkowski
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  MRI in head and neck cancer following chemoradiotherapy: what is the optimal delay to demonstrate maximal response?

Authors:  S E J Connor; C Burd; N Sivarasan; V Goh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.