Literature DB >> 21607041

The role of tumor size and patient's age as prognostic factors in laryngeal cancer.

K Markou1, J Goudakos, S Triaridis, J Konstantinidis, V Vital, A Nikolaou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The loco-regional recurrence of laryngeal carcinoma in patients who underwent total laryngectomy is related to numerous factors. Aim of the present study was to investigate the role of patient's age and tumor size in the recurrence rate of patients. Additional aim of the current study was to investigate the possible associations between the size of the tumor and other characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 1st Department of Otorhinolaryngology of AHEPA University Hospital, from 1992 to 2007, 255 patients with laryngeal carcinoma underwent total laryngectomy. Accurate data regarding the size of the tumor were obtained. Total laryngectomy was the initial treatment in 212 patients, while in the remaining 43 patients was performed as salvage surgery after recurrence.
RESULTS: The median tumor size was 2.74 cm (0.8-5.5 cm). There was no significant difference in the median tumor size between the patients who had recurrence (2.87 cm) and the disease free patients (2.69 cm). The median size of glottic tumors (2.47 cm) was smaller than that of supraglottic (2.95 cm) and of subglottic tumors (3.27 cm) (p<0.05). Among the 255 patients, recurrence of the tumor occurred in 73 (28.7%). Statistical analysis of the data showed that the tumor size was affecting the recurrence rate in a different manner, according the stage of the tumor. The recurrence rate in T3 neoplasms was higher in larger tumors than in smaller (13.2% for tumors<2cm, 62% for tumors>4cm), while T4 carcinomas appeared to have the opposite behavior (66.5% for tumors <2cm, 23% for tumors >4cm). The median tumor size in T4 patients that recurred was smaller than in those with no recurrence (2.8 cm Vs 3.3 cm). This behavior was observed in T4 tumors from all sites. Patients who experienced recurrence and had positive neck lymph nodes at the time of the initial diagnosis appeared to have smaller laryngeal tumors (2.7 cm), compared to with the same group of patients with no recurrence (3.5 cm). Supraglottic location and advanced T stage showed a statistically significant impact on disease free survival, based on Cox regression model.
CONCLUSIONS: Smaller sized tumors in patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer (T4) or regionally (N+) appear to have more aggressive behavior and higher recurrence rate. Thus, the small tumor size could be regarded as an unfavorable prognostic factor for those laryngeal cancer cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcinoma; laryngeal; recurrence; size; tumor

Year:  2011        PMID: 21607041      PMCID: PMC3093151     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippokratia        ISSN: 1108-4189            Impact factor:   0.471


  14 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx.

Authors:  D Danic; M Maruĭć; B Uzarević; D Milicić
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.538

2.  Prognostic factors for survival in patients with T3 laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  J J Manni; C H Terhaard; M F de Boer; G A Croll; F J Hilgers; A A Annyas; A G van der Meij; G J Hordijk
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Delayed regional metastases, distant metastases, and second primary malignancies in squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx and hypopharynx.

Authors:  J G Spector; D G Sessions; B H Haughey; K S Chao; J Simpson; S El Mofty; C A Perez
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Apoptosis in situ, p53, bcl-2 and AgNOR counts as prognostic factors in laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  J O Pulkkinen; P Klemi; P Martikainen; R Grénman
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  Blood transfusion and other prognostic variables in the survival of patients with cancer of the head and neck.

Authors:  S Barra; L Barzan; A Maione; A Cadelano; M Pin; S Franceschi; R Comoretto
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Prognostic significance of lymph node reactivity in patients with laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  C Stankiewicz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Progression difference between cancers of the larynx and hypopharynx is not due to tumor size and vascularization.

Authors:  J Lukits; J Timár; A Juhász; B Döme; S Paku; G Répássy
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Prognostic factors in supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  C Morales-Angulo; F Val-Bernal; L Buelta; F Fernandez; L García-Castrillo; J Rama
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  The prognostic significance of the biomarkers p21WAF1/CIP1, p53, and bcl-2 in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Y T Jin; S Kayser; B L Kemp; N G Ordonez; S L Tucker; G L Clayman; H Goepfert; M A Luna; J G Batsakis; A K El-Naggar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Discriminant analysis in predicting survival of patients with cancer of the larynx or hypopharynx.

Authors:  J Gavilán; C Gavilán; M Mañós-Pujol; J Herranz
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1987-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of Risk Factors for Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Qihe Zhang; Huanhuan Wang; Qin Zhao; Yuyu Zhang; Zhuangzhuang Zheng; Shiyu Liu; Zijing Liu; Lingbin Meng; Ying Xin; Xin Jiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Retrospective analysis of prognostic factors in 205 patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent surgical treatment.

Authors:  Si-Yi Zhang; Zhong-Ming Lu; Xiao-Ning Luo; Liang-Si Chen; Ping-Jiang Ge; Xin-Han Song; Shao-Hua Chen; Yi-Long Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Cancer recurrence times from a branching process model.

Authors:  Stefano Avanzini; Tibor Antal
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 4.  Which risk factors are associated with stomal recurrence after total laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer? A meta-analysis of the last 30 years.

Authors:  Jiwang Liang; Xiangyu Zhu; Wei Zeng; Tao Yu; Fengqin Fang; Yuejiao Zhao
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.