Literature DB >> 11444088

Clinical performance of a highly portable, scanning calcaneal ultrasonometer.

S L Greenspan1, S Cheng, P D Miller, E S Orwoll.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish a normative database, assess precision, and evaluate the ability to identify women with low bone mass and to discriminate women with fracture from those without for a highly portable, scanning calcaneal ultrasonometer: the QUS-2. Fourteen hundred and one Caucasian women were recruited for the study. Among them were 794 healthy women 25-84 years of age evenly distributed per 10-year period to establish a normative database. Of these, 171 aged 25-34 years were defined as the young normal group for the purpose of T-score determination. Precision was assessed within 1 day (short-term) and over a 16-week period (long-term) in 79 women aged 25-84 years. Five hundred twenty-eight women ranging from 50 to 84 years of age with or without prevalent fractures of the spine, hip or forearm were measured to compare the QUS-2 with bone mineral density (BMD) of the hip and spine. Mean calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) was constant in healthy women from 25 to 54 years of age and decreased with increasing age thereafter. Short-term precision, with and without repositioning of the heel, and long-term precision yielded comparable results (BUA SDs of 2.1-2.4 dB/MHz, coefficients of variations (CVs) of 2.5-2.9%). Calcaneal BUA was significantly correlated with BMD of the total hip (TH), femoral neck (FN) and lumbar spine (LS) in 698 women (r = 0.6-0.7, all p < 0.0001). A similar relationship was observed for LS BMD compared with either TH or FN BMD (r = 0.7, p < 0.0001). Prevalence of osteoporosis in our population (WHO criteria) was 20%, 17%, 21%, and 24% for BUA, BMD of the TH, FN and LS, respectively. Age-adjusted values for a 1 SD reduction in calcaneal BUA and TH and FN BMD predicted prevalent fractures of the spine, forearm, and hip with significant (p < 0.05) odds ratios of 2.3, 2.0 and 2.1, respectively. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for age-adjusted bone mass values predicting prevalent fracture were 0.62 for BUA, 0.59 for TH BMD, 0.60 for FN BMD, and 0.57 for LS BMD; all statistically equivalent. We conclude that the QUS-2 calcaneal ultrasonometer exhibits reproducible clinical performance that is similar to BMD of the spine and hip in identifying women with low bone mass and discriminating women with fracture from those without.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11444088     DOI: 10.1007/s001980170108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  13 in total

1.  The effect of age and bone mineral density on the absolute, excess, and relative risk of fracture in postmenopausal women aged 50-99: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA).

Authors:  E S Siris; S K Brenneman; E Barrett-Connor; P D Miller; S Sajjan; M L Berger; Y-T Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  A nomogram for predicting osteoporosis risk based on age, weight and quantitative ultrasound measurement.

Authors:  C Pongchaiyakul; S Panichkul; T Songpatanasilp; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone mineral density of the tarsals and metatarsals with reloading.

Authors:  Mary Kent Hastings; Judy Gelber; Paul K Commean; Fred Prior; David R Sinacore
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-04-03

4.  Heel ultrasound can assess maintenance of bone mass in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Gabrielle A Langmann; Karen T Vujevich; Donna Medich; Megan E Miller; Subashan Perera; Susan L Greenspan
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Quantitative heel ultrasound in a population-based study in Italy and its relationship with fracture history: the ESOPO study.

Authors:  S Maggi; M Noale; S Giannini; S Adami; D Defeo; G Isaia; L Sinigaglia; P Filipponi; G Crepaldi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Bone mineral density during total contact cast immobilization for a patient with neuropathic (Charcot) arthropathy.

Authors:  Mary K Hastings; David R Sinacore; Faye A Fielder; Jeffrey E Johnson
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-03

7.  Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk: An Update.

Authors:  Didier Hans; Antoine Métrailler; Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez; Olivier Lamy; Enisa Shevroja
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Risk for osteoporosis in elderly nuns: need for better recognition and treatment.

Authors:  Mary E Elliott; Beth A Martin; Nathan L Kanous; Molly Carnes; Barbara Komoroske; Neil C Binkley
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2003-02

Review 9.  Guidelines for the diagnosis of osteoporosis: T-scores vs fractures.

Authors:  Paul D Miller
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Effect of age and disease on bone mass in Japanese patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Norio Sugawara; Norio Yasui-Furukori; Takashi Umeda; Shoko Tsuchimine; Akira Fujii; Yasushi Sato; Manabu Saito; Hanako Furukori; Kazuma Danjo; Masashi Matsuzaka; Ippei Takahashi; Sunao Kaneko
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.