Literature DB >> 11443406

Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients.

H Lorch1, M Zwaan, C Kagel, H D Weiss.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess safety and function of central venous port systems implanted percutaneously in the interventional radiology suite.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five consecutive ports in 123 patients were evaluated retrospectively. One hundred and twenty ports were implanted via the subclavian vein.
RESULTS: Technical success was 100%. Fourteen patients (11.2%) experienced immediate procedural complications, all minor (pneumothorax 1.6%). During follow-up (4-343 days, mean service period 97.8 days), nine complications occurred, six of which were major. These were three port infections which led to hospitalization and port removal, one chamber penetration through the skin, and two port occlusions. Port removal as a result of complications was performed in six patients. Altogether, 20 complications occurred within a total of 11,056 days of service, which means 1.8 events per 1000 days of service.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous implantation of central venous port systems is safe and easy to perform. Complication rates of this study compare favorably with those of other radiological and surgical series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11443406     DOI: 10.1007/s002700001721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  31 in total

1.  Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems.

Authors:  Ulf K M Teichgräber; Stephan Kausche; Sebastian N Nagel; Bernhard Gebauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of hemorrhagic complications of interventional radiology procedures.

Authors:  Mark L Lessne; Brian Holly; Steven Y Huang; Charles Y Kim
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Placement of port-a-cath through the right internal jugular vein under ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  E Capalbo; M Peli; M Lovisatti; M Cosentino; V Ticha; M Cariati; G Cornalba
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Percutaneous image-guided implantation of totally implantable venous access ports in the forearm or the chest? A patients' point of view.

Authors:  Jan Peter Goltz; Bernhard Petritsch; Johannes Kirchner; Dietbert Hahn; Ralph Kickuth
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Totally Implantable Central Venous Port Catheters: Radiation Exposure as a Function of Puncture Site and Operator Experience.

Authors:  Martin Jonczyk; Bernhard Gebauer; Roman Rotzinger; Dirk Schnapauff; Bernd Hamm; Federico Collettini
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Choosing the appropriate side for subcutaneous port catheter placement in patients with mastectomy: ipsilateral or contralateral?

Authors:  Omer Fatih Nas; Kadir Hacikurt; Ahmet Kaya; Nurullah Dogan; Bekir Sanal; Guven Ozkaya; Halit Ziya Dundar; Cuneyt Erdogan
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  [How should urologists perform implantation of subcutaneous central venous port systems? A single center experience of 347 cases].

Authors:  M Schenck; W Michels-Oswald; S Tschirdewahn; H Rübben; F Vom Dorp; A Rose; A Panic; C Niedworok; R Rossi
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Administration of chemotherapy via the median cubital vein without implantable central venous access ports: port-free chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Yoichiro Yoshida; Seiichiro Hoshino; Naoya Aisu; Masayasu Naito; Syu Tanimura; Ai Mogi; Toshihiro Tanaka; Keiji Hirata; Kazuo Tamura; Yuichi Yamashita
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Long-term outcomes of peripheral arm ports implanted in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Junichiro Kawamura; Satoshi Nagayama; Akinari Nomura; Atsushi Itami; Hiroshi Okabe; Seiji Sato; Go Watanabe; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  J Vardy; K Engelhardt; K Cox; J Jacquet; A McDade; M Boyer; P Beale; M Stockler; R Loneragan; B Dennien; R Waugh; S J Clarke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.