Literature DB >> 15580415

Non-pregnant patients' preference for delivery route.

Andrea R Thurman1, James S Zoller, Steven E Swift.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to survey non-pregnant women regarding their preference for obstetric delivery route and to assess their awareness of the maternal and fetal risks of obstetric delivery. We wished to determine the percentage of non-pregnant women who would choose elective cesarean section and to correlate demographic factors. We compared women who elected cesarean delivery versus vaginal delivery. All patients presenting for routine gynecologic care were asked to complete an anonymous survey. Demographic variables analyzed were patient age, race, employment, insurance type and household income. Secondary data regarding knowledge of the risks and benefits of cesarean and vaginal delivery were assessed with a Likert Scale. Of patients surveyed, 13.3% preferred cesarean section. The only significant demographic factor was was race, with 21.7% of non-whites and 7.8% of whites choosing cesarean section. Most patients agreed that elective cesarean sections should be performed and reimbursed by insurance. The majority of women answered neutral regarding the maternal and neonatal risks of obstetrical delivery. The unique feature of this observational study is the sole participation of non-pregnant patients. The percentage of women who would elect cesarean section has significant public health implications. The only difference noted between demographic groups is that non-white women had a stronger preference for cesarean. Without counseling, most women are unsure of the risks of delivery route on maternal and neonatal health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15580415     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-004-1164-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  41 in total

1.  Patient education is way to influence maternal requests for caesarean section.

Authors:  L M Irvine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-17

2.  Advising prospective mothers about the maternal morbidity of vaginal childbirth.

Authors:  Richard C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? Yes, as long as the woman is fully informed.

Authors:  S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-15

4.  Risk of new-onset urinary incontinence after forceps and vacuum delivery in primiparous women.

Authors:  L A Arya; N D Jackson; D L Myers; A Verma
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Cesarean section. Risk and benefits for mother and fetus.

Authors:  B P Sachs; B J McCarthy; G Rubin; A Burton; J Terry; C W Tyler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-10-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section.

Authors:  W J Graham; V Hundley; A L McCheyne; M H Hall; E Gurney; J Milne
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1999-03

Review 7.  Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature.

Authors:  J A Gamble; D K Creedy
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.689

8.  Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization.

Authors:  M Lydon-Rochelle; V L Holt; D P Martin; T R Easterling
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The influence of maternal request on the elective caesarean section rate.

Authors:  N V Jackson; L M Irvine
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 10.  Cesarean section.

Authors:  D N Danforth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-02-08       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prevalence and correlates of stress urinary incontinence during pregnancy: a survey at UNICAMP Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  K P Scarpa; V Herrmann; P C R Palma; C L Z Riccetto; S S Morais
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-07-15

2.  U.S. Nulliparas' Reasons for Expected Provider Type and Childbirth Setting.

Authors:  Adriana Arcia
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2015

3.  Preferences and concerns for delivery: an antepartum survey.

Authors:  Jessica N Bracken; Vicki L Dryfhout; Linda M Goldenhar; Rachel N Pauls
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-07-17

Review 4.  Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  A Mazzoni; F Althabe; N H Liu; A M Bonotti; L Gibbons; A J Sánchez; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 7.331

Review 5.  Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders.

Authors:  Alice Yuen Loke; Louise Davies; Yim-Wah Mak
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.