Literature DB >> 21400201

Cesarean delivery on maternal request: a western North Carolina perspective.

Stephanie T Romero1, Carol C Coulson, Shelley L Galvin.   

Abstract

Cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR), a primary cesarean without medical indication for a singleton, term pregnancy, has been identified by physicians as one factor in the increasing rate of cesarean delivery despite nationwide efforts to the contrary. The purpose of this project was to better understand women's preferences and motivations for their desired mode of delivery. A 62-item survey was administered to pregnant women asking for their delivery preference, their reasons, sources of information, feelings about this pregnancy, and opinions about delivery options. Responses were analyzed for candidates for CDMR or for repeat cesarean section, separately; the standard error of measure is ±4% (95% CI). 396 patients returned surveys (response rate = 63.2%). CDMR was desired by 34/316 (11%) candidates; repeat cesarean was desired by 32/70 (46%) patients. Significant correlates of CDMR included choosing during the first trimester (22% vs. 8.2%; RR = 2.72; P = 0.015), smoking during pregnancy (19.7% vs. 7.6%; RR = 2.60; P = 0.036), and being worried about the delivery (P = 0.004). Desire for CDMR increased as worries increased from unworried (4.4%) to somewhat (11.8%) to very worried (27.6%). Primary reasons included existing medical complications and preventing birth injury. The majority of patients believed CDMR should be an "informed choice"; other opinions varied by delivery preference. The majority of women preferred vaginal deliveries suggesting little contribution of CDMR to the increasing cesarean rate. Contrary to physicians' beliefs, the women's primary objective was their infants' health rather than their own well-being.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21400201     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-011-0769-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  33 in total

1.  Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey.

Authors:  Thomas Bergholt; Birgitte Østberg; Jesper Legarth; Tom Weber
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Elective primary cesarean delivery: attitudes of urogynecology and maternal-fetal medicine specialists.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wu; Andrew F Hundley; Anthony G Visco
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 3.  Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term.

Authors:  T Lavender; G J Hofmeyr; J P Neilson; C Kingdon; G M L Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-07-19

4.  FIGO Committee Report. FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Authors:  J G Schenker; J M Cain
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Choice and birth method: mixed-method study of caesarean delivery for maternal request.

Authors:  C Kingdon; J Neilson; V Singleton; G Gyte; A Hart; M Gabbay; T Lavender
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 7.  Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Howard Minkoff; Kathleen R Powderly; Frank Chervenak; Lawrence B McCullough
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Caesarean section on request: are there loco-regional factors influencing maternal choice? An Italian experience.

Authors:  A Mancuso; A De Vivo; G Fanara; A Albiero; A M Priolo; A Giacobbe; M Franchi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Patients' attitudes associated with cesarean delivery on maternal request in an urban population.

Authors:  Leo Pevzner; Dena Goffman; Margaret Comerford Freda; Ashlesha K Dayal
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Cesarean delivery on demand: what will it cost?

Authors:  Brent W Bost
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  4 in total

1.  Factors influencing the decision that women make on their mode of delivery: the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  Alice Yuen Loke; Louise Davies; Sau-fun Li
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Effects of reviewing childbirth scenarios on choice of delivery type: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Massome Rasoli; Seyed Mohammad Mirrezaie; Ensieh Fooladi; Robabeh Zarouj Hosseini; Mahsa Fayaz
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03-27

Review 3.  Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders.

Authors:  Alice Yuen Loke; Louise Davies; Yim-Wah Mak
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Causes and Grounds of Childbirth Fear and Coping Strategies Used by Kurdish Adolescent Pregnant Women in Iran: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Javad Yoosefi Lebni; Farideh Khalajabadi Farahani; Mahnaz Solhi; Farbod Ebadi Fard Azar
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.