Literature DB >> 112243

Responses of retinal rods to single photons.

D A Baylor, T D Lamb, K W Yau.   

Abstract

1. A suction electrode was used to record the membrane current of single rod outer segments in pieces of toad retina. During dim illumination the membrane current showed pronounced fluctuations. 2. Amplitude histograms of responses to dim flashes of fixed intensity exhibited two discrete peaks, one at 0 pA and one near 1 pA, suggesting that the response was quantized. By setting a criterion amplitude level, flash responses could be classed as 'failures' (no response) or as 'successes' (at least one quantal event). 3. The variation of fraction of successes with flash intensity was consistent with the hypothesis that each quantal electrical event resulted from a single photoisomerization. 4. The quantal event had a mean amplitude of about 1 pA (5% of the standing dark current) and a standard deviation of 0.2 pA. Dispersion in the event amplitude prevented identification of histogram peaks corresponding to two or more photoisomerizations. 5. Individual quantal responses exhibited a smooth shape very similar to that of the average quantal response. This suggests that a single photoisomerization releases many particles of transmitter and that radial diffusion of internal transmitter is not a major source of delay in the light response. 6. The 'quantum efficiency' with which an absorbed photon generated an electrical event was measured as 0.5 +/- 0.1 (S.E. of mean, n = 4). This is slightly lower than the quantum efficiency of photoisomerization obtained previously for rhodopsin in solution. 7. At wavelengths between 420 and 700 nm the quantal event was invariant in size, although the cell's sensitivity varied over a range of 10(5). 8. The power spectrum of the fluctuations in dim steady light was predicted by assuming that a random series of quantal events occurred independently. 9. In brighter light the fluctuations were faster, and the response to an incremental flash was reduced in size and duration. The power spectrum could be predicted by assuming random superposition of events with the shape of the incremental flash response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 112243      PMCID: PMC1281447     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  18 in total

1.  The membrane current of single rod outer segments.

Authors:  D A Baylor; T D Lamb; K W Yau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  VISUAL ADAPTATION.

Authors:  W A RUSHTON
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1965-03-16

3.  Quantum sensitivity of rods in the toad retina.

Authors:  G L Fain
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-03-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Rod-rod interaction in the retina of the turtle.

Authors:  E A Schwartz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Theory of flicker and transient responses. I. Uniform fields.

Authors:  D H Kelly
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1971-04

6.  The electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light.

Authors:  D A Baylor; A L Hodgkin; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Electrical responses of single cones in the retina of the turtle.

Authors:  D A Baylor; M G Fuortes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Light-induced fluctuations in membrane current of single toad rod outer segments.

Authors:  K W Yau; T D Lamb; D A Baylor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-09-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OF DISCRETE POTENTIAL WAVES IN THE EYE OF LIMULUS.

Authors:  M G FUORTES; S YEANDLE
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  THE RAT ELECTRORETINOGRAM. II. BLOCH'S LAW AND THE LATENCY MECHANISM OF THE B-WAVE.

Authors:  R A CONE
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  295 in total

1.  Protein-assisted pericyclic reactions: an alternate hypothesis for the action of quantal receptors.

Authors:  W Radding; T Romo; G N Phillips
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Analysis of Ca++-dependent gain changes in PDE activation in vertebrate rod phototransduction.

Authors:  R D Hamer
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2000-12-31       Impact factor: 2.367

3.  "Either-or" two-slit interference: stable coherent propagation of individual photons through separate slits.

Authors:  D L Alkon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Single photon responses in Drosophila photoreceptors and their regulation by Ca2+.

Authors:  S R Henderson; H Reuss; R C Hardie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Dynamic and steady-state light adaptation of mouse rod photoreceptors in vivo.

Authors:  G A Silva; J R Hetling; D R Pepperberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The membrane current of single rod outer segments.

Authors:  D A Baylor; T D Lamb; K W Yau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Role of guanylyl cyclase modulation in mouse cone phototransduction.

Authors:  Keisuke Sakurai; Jeannie Chen; Vladimir J Kefalov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  G-protein betagamma-complex is crucial for efficient signal amplification in vision.

Authors:  Alexander V Kolesnikov; Loryn Rikimaru; Anne K Hennig; Peter D Lukasiewicz; Steven J Fliesler; Victor I Govardovskii; Vladimir J Kefalov; Oleg G Kisselev
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Oligomeric forms of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).

Authors:  Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 13.807

10.  Assembly of an activated rhodopsin-transducin complex in nanoscale lipid bilayers.

Authors:  Aaron M D'Antona; Guifu Xie; Stephen G Sligar; Daniel D Oprian
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.