Literature DB >> 1454340

Comparison of depth of focus and low-contrast acuities for monofocal versus multifocal intraocular lens patients at 1 year.

C T Post1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Multifocal lenses have been shown to produce enhanced near and intermediate vision. The division of incoming light into more than one focal point must physically produce retinal images of reduced contrast. The purpose of this report is to provide quantitative data on the increased depth of focus and decreased contrast sensitivity demonstrated in patients receiving the 3M diffractive multifocal lens versus the parent monofocal control lens.
METHODS: Uncorrected and best-corrected distance and near acuities, Regan and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity measurements, and defocus curves were obtained on 22 eyes with monofocal and 16 eyes with multifocal age-matched, pathology-free implants at 1 year after surgery.
FINDINGS: Visual acuity data demonstrated significantly improved (P < 0.001) near acuities in multifocal patients with manifest refraction in place. No difference was noted between implants for other acuity measures. A statistically significant reduction (P < 0.05) in contrast sensitivity was measured for multifocal implants at the limits of contrast and resolution (Regan 4%); however, careful patient questioning revealed no clinical impact. Defocus curves demonstrated significantly increased (P < 0.0001) depth of focus at the 20/40 acuity level of 3.8 diopters (D) in multifocal patients versus 1.8 D in monofocal patients.
CONCLUSION: The quantifiable and expected loss of contrast sensitivity in the examining lane, not manifest in patient awareness, appears to be an acceptable tradeoff for enhanced near/intermediate vision and depth of focus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1454340     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31735-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  8 in total

1.  Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jit B Ale; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  All-distance visual acuity in eyes with a nontinted or a yellow-tinted diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Miki Masumoto; Hideyuki Hayashi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  The clinical depth of field achievable with trifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses: theoretical considerations and proof of concept clinical results.

Authors:  Ante Barišić; Sudi Patel; Nikica Gabric; Claes G Feinbaum
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Subjective and objective depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes: comparison between extended depth of focus, trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Rubén Sánchez-Jean; David Carmona-González; David P Piñero; Ainhoa Molina-Martín
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Tritan colour contrast sensitivity function in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  S Pieh; G Hanselmayer; B Lackner; P Marvan; A Grechenig; H Weghaupt; C Vass; C Skorpik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  S Pieh; B Lackner; G Hanselmayer; R Zöhrer; M Sticker; H Weghaupt; A Fercher; C Skorpik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Cost effectiveness of foldable multifocal intraocular lenses compared to foldable monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery.

Authors:  M G T Dolders; M D Nijkamp; R M M A Nuijts; B van den Borne; F Hendrikse; A Ament; W Groot
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS.

Authors:  Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Rubén Sánchez-Jean; David Carmona-Gonzalez; David P Piñero; Ainhoa Molina-Martín
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.