Literature DB >> 17056852

Falling rates of perinatal postmortem examination: are we to blame?

C Rose, M Evans, J Tooley.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 17056852      PMCID： PMC2672775          DOI： 10.1136/adc.2005.091314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN： 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Consent to autopsy for neonates.

Authors:  H E McHaffie; P W Fowlie; R Hume; I A Laing; D J Lloyd; A J Lyon
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Are perinatal autopsy rates satisfactory?

Authors:  T Y Khong; F A Mansor; A J Staples
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  The clinical utility of the perinatal autopsy.

Authors:  D N Saller; K B Lesser; U Harrel; B B Rogers; C E Oyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-22       Impact factor: 56.272
  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Decision influences and aftermath: parents, stillbirth and autopsy.

Authors:  Dell Horey; Vicki Flenady; Liz Conway; Emma McLeod; Teck Yee Khong
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Interventions for investigating and identifying the causes of stillbirth.

Authors:  Aleena M Wojcieszek; Emily Shepherd; Philippa Middleton; Glenn Gardener; David A Ellwood; Elizabeth M McClure; Katherine J Gold; Teck Yee Khong; Robert M Silver; Jan Jaap Hm Erwich; Vicki Flenady
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-30

3.  Factors influencing the uptake of neonatal bereavement support services - Findings from two tertiary neonatal centres in the UK.

Authors:  Jayanta Banerjee; Charanjit Kaur; Sridhar Ramaiah; Rahul Roy; Narendra Aladangady
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.234
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.