Literature DB >> 11417054

Biomechanical analysis of movement strategies in human forward trunk bending. I. Modeling.

A V Alexandrov1, A A Frolov, J Massion.   

Abstract

Two behavioral goals are achieved simultaneously during forward trunk bending in humans: the bending movement per se and equilibrium maintenance. The objective of the present study was to understand how the two goals are achieved by using a biomechanical model of this task. Since keeping the center of pressure inside the support area is a crucial condition for equilibrium maintenance during the movement, we decided to model an extreme case, called "optimal bending", in which the movement is performed without any center of pressure displacement at all, as if standing on an extremely narrow support. The "optimal bending" is used as a reference in the analysis of experimental data in a companion paper. The study is based on a three-joint (ankle, knee, and hip) model of the human body and is performed in terms of "eigenmovements", i.e., the movements along eigenvectors of the motion equation. They are termed "ankle", "hip", and "knee" eigenmovements according to the dominant joint that provides the largest contribution to the corresponding eigenmovement. The advantage of the eigenmovement approach is the presentation of the coupled system of dynamic equations in the form of three independent motion equations. Each of these equations is equivalent to the motion equation for an inverted pendulum. Optimal bending is constructed as a superposition of two (hip and ankle) eigenmovements. The hip eigenmovement contributes the most to the movement kinematics, whereas the contributions of both eigenmovements into the movement dynamics are comparable. The ankle eigenmovement moves the center of gravity forward and compensates for the backward center of gravity shift that is provoked by trunk bending as a result of dynamic interactions between body segments. An important characteristic of the optimal bending is the timing of the onset of each eigenmovement: the ankle eigenmovement onset precedes that of the hip eigenmovement. Without an earlier onset of the ankle eigenmovement, forward bending on the extremely narrow support results in falling backward. This modeling approach suggests that during trunk bending, two motion units--the hip and ankle eigenmovements--are responsible for the movement and for equilibrium maintenance, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11417054     DOI: 10.1007/PL00007986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  25 in total

1.  Movement sway: changes in postural sway during voluntary shifts of the center of pressure.

Authors:  Mark L Latash; Sandra S Ferreira; Silvana A Wieczorek; Marcos Duarte
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The influence of sensory information on two-component coordination during quiet stance.

Authors:  Yuanfen Zhang; Tim Kiemel; John Jeka
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Kinematic synergy adaptation to an unstable support surface and equilibrium maintenance during forward trunk movement.

Authors:  S Vernazza-Martin; N Martin; A Le Pellec-Muller; V Tricon; J Massion
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effect of aging on the coordination between equilibrium and movement: what changes?

Authors:  S Vernazza-Martin; V Tricon; N Martin; S Mesure; J P Azulay; A Le Pellec-Muller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multi-muscle synergies in an unusual postural task: quick shear force production.

Authors:  Thomas Robert; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A feedback model explains the differential scaling of human postural responses to perturbation acceleration and velocity.

Authors:  Torrence D J Welch; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Flexible muscle modes and synergies in challenging whole-body tasks.

Authors:  Alessander Danna-Dos-Santos; Adriana M Degani; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The role of vestibular and somatosensory systems in intersegmental control of upright stance.

Authors:  Rob Creath; Tim Kiemel; Fay Horak; John J Jeka
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  A mathematical tool to generate complex whole body motor tasks and test hypotheses on underlying motor planning.

Authors:  Michele Tagliabue; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Thierry Pozzo; Giancarlo Ferrigno
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Identification of the plant for upright stance in humans: multiple movement patterns from a single neural strategy.

Authors:  Tim Kiemel; Alexander J Elahi; John J Jeka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.