Literature DB >> 18521583

Flexible muscle modes and synergies in challenging whole-body tasks.

Alessander Danna-Dos-Santos1, Adriana M Degani, Mark L Latash.   

Abstract

We used the idea of hierarchical control to study multi-muscle synergies during a whole-body sway task performed by a standing person. Within this view, at the lower level of the hierarchy, muscles are united into groups (M-modes). At the higher level, gains at the M-modes are co-varied by the controller in a task-specific way to ensure low variability of important physical variables. In particular, we hypothesized that (1) the composition of M-modes could adjust and (2) an index of M-mode co-variation would become weaker in more challenging conditions. Subjects were required to perform a whole-body sway at 0.5 Hz paced by a metronome. They performed the task with eyes open and closed, while standing on both feet or on one foot only, with and without vibration applied to the Achilles tendons. Integrated indices of muscle activation were subjected to principal component analysis to identify M-modes. An increase in the task complexity led to an increase in the number of principal components that contained significantly loaded indices of muscle activation from 3 to 5. Hence, in more challenging tasks, the controller manipulated a larger number of variables. Multiple regression analysis was used to define the Jacobian of the system mapping small changes in M-mode gains onto shifts of the center of pressure (COP) in the anterior-posterior direction. Further, the variance in the M-mode space across sway cycles was partitioned into two components, one that did not affect an average across cycles COP coordinate and the other that did (good and bad variance, respectively). Under all conditions, the subjects showed substantially more good variance than bad variance interpreted as a multi-M-mode synergy stabilizing the COP trajectory. An index of the strength of the synergy was comparable across all conditions, and there was no modulation of this index over the sway cycle. Hence, our first hypothesis that the composition of M-modes could adjust under challenging conditions has been confirmed while the second hypothesis stating that the index of M-mode co-variation would become weaker in more challenging conditions has been falsified. We interpret the observations as suggesting that adjustments at the lower level of the hierarchy-in the M-mode composition-allowed the subjects to maintain a comparable level of stabilization of the COP trajectory in more challenging tasks. The findings support the (at least) two-level hierarchical control scheme of whole-body movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18521583      PMCID: PMC2557102          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1413-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  51 in total

1.  The effects of muscle vibration on anticipatory postural adjustments.

Authors:  Harm Slijper; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Muscle modes during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons: effect of instability and additional support.

Authors:  Vijaya Krishnamoorthy; Mark L Latash; John P Scholz; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Phase reversal of biomechanical functions and muscle activity in backward pedaling.

Authors:  L H Ting; S A Kautz; D A Brown; F E Zajac
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Matrix factorization algorithms for the identification of muscle synergies: evaluation on simulated and experimental data sets.

Authors:  Matthew C Tresch; Vincent C K Cheung; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Muscle synergy organization is robust across a variety of postural perturbations.

Authors:  Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Jane M Macpherson; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effect of vision and stance width on human body motion when standing: implications for afferent control of lateral sway.

Authors:  B L Day; M J Steiger; P D Thompson; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Evaluation of single-leg standing following anterior cruciate ligament surgery and rehabilitation.

Authors:  E L Harrison; N Duenkel; R Dunlop; G Russell
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1994-03

9.  Coordination of locomotion with voluntary movements in humans.

Authors:  Yuri P Ivanenko; Germana Cappellini; Nadia Dominici; Richard E Poppele; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Muscle modes and synergies during voluntary body sway.

Authors:  Alessander Danna-Dos-Santos; Kajetan Slomka; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 2.064

View more
  23 in total

1.  Sensitivity of body sway parameters during quiet standing to manipulation of support surface size.

Authors:  Sarabon Nejc; Rosker Jernej; Stefan Loefler; Helmut Kern
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Multi-muscle control during bipedal stance: an EMG-EMG analysis approach.

Authors:  Alessander Danna-Dos-Santos; Tjeerd W Boonstra; Adriana M Degani; Vinicius S Cardoso; Alessandra T Magalhaes; Luis Mochizuki; Charles T Leonard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Synergies and Motor Equivalence in Voluntary Sway Tasks: The Effects of Visual and Mechanical Constraints.

Authors:  Mariusz P Furmanek; Stanisław Solnik; Daniele Piscitelli; Omid Rasouli; Ali Falaki; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Synergies at the level of motor units in single-finger and multi-finger tasks.

Authors:  Shirin Madarshahian; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The influence of visual information on multi-muscle control during quiet stance: a spectral analysis approach.

Authors:  Alessander Danna-Dos-Santos; Adriana M Degani; Tjeerd W Boonstra; Luis Mochizuki; Allison M Harney; Megan M Schmeckpeper; Lori C Tabor; Charles T Leonard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Optimization and variability of motor behavior in multifinger tasks: what variables does the brain use?

Authors:  Joel R Martin; Alexander V Terekhov; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Two stages and three components of the postural preparation to action.

Authors:  Vennila Krishnan; Alexander S Aruin; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Stability of vertical posture explored with unexpected mechanical perturbations: synergy indices and motor equivalence.

Authors:  Momoko Yamagata; Ali Falaki; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of muscle fatigue on multi-muscle synergies.

Authors:  Tarkeshwar Singh; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Task-specific stability in muscle activation space during unintentional movements.

Authors:  Ali Falaki; Farzad Towhidkhah; Tao Zhou; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.