Literature DB >> 16552562

Kinematic synergy adaptation to an unstable support surface and equilibrium maintenance during forward trunk movement.

S Vernazza-Martin1, N Martin, A Le Pellec-Muller, V Tricon, J Massion.   

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to study the adaptation to an unstable support surface of kinematic synergy responsible for equilibrium control during upper trunk movements. Eight adult subjects were asked to bend their upper trunk forward to an angle of 35 degrees and then to hold the final position for 3 s, first in a standard condition, with two feet on the ground and the second, on a rocking platform swinging in the sagittal plane. The movement characteristics (duration, amplitude, and mean angular velocity of the trunk), the time course of the antero-posterior center of mass (CM) shift during the movement, and the EMG pattern of the main muscles involved in the movement were studied under the two experimental conditions. Kinematic synergy was quantified by performing a principal component analysis on the hip, knee, and ankle angle changes occurring during the movement. The results indicate that (1) the CM shift from the very onset of the movement remains controlled during performance of the forward trunk movement when the equilibrium constraints were increased; (2) the principal component analysis of the hip, knee, and ankle angle changes occurring during the movement showed a transition from one principal component (PC(1)) in the standard condition to two components in the rocking platform condition; (3) the greatest contribution of PC(1) (weight coefficients) was located at the hip level in both the standard and rocking platform conditions, while the greatest contribution of PC(2) in the rocking platform condition was located at the ankle level; and (4) the EMG pattern underlying kinematic synergy is modified. It is concluded that a simple adaptation of kinematic synergy by changing the weight coefficients of each pair of joints participating in the movement is no longer sufficient when the equilibrium constraints increase and, rather, disturbs equilibrium. The CNS has to provide two parallel controls, one to perform the trunk movement and the other to preserve equilibrium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16552562     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0364-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  Interjoint coordination in lower limbs during different movements in humans.

Authors:  Nancy St-Onge; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning multi-finger synergies: an uncontrolled manifold analysis.

Authors:  Ning Kang; Minoru Shinohara; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Postural maintenance during fast forward bending: a model simulation experiment determines the "reduced trajectory".

Authors:  C F Ramos; L W Stark
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Motor function in microgravity: movement in weightlessness.

Authors:  J R Lackner; P DiZio
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Influence of event anticipation on postural actions accompanying voluntary movement.

Authors:  J E Brown; J S Frank
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Cerebrocerebellar communication systems.

Authors:  G I Allen; N Tsukahara
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Modification of human postural response to leg muscle vibration by electrical vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  F Hlavacka; M Krizková; F B Horak
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1995-04-07       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Is the trunk a reference frame for calculating leg position?

Authors:  L Mouchnino; R Aurenty; J Massion; A Pedotti
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Human postural responses.

Authors:  C D Marsden; P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Forward and backward axial synergies in man.

Authors:  P Crenna; C Frigo; J Massion; A Pedotti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effect of aging on the coordination between equilibrium and movement: what changes?

Authors:  S Vernazza-Martin; V Tricon; N Martin; S Mesure; J P Azulay; A Le Pellec-Muller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Pointing control using a moving base of support.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Taegyong Kwon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Segmental specificity in belly dance mimics primal trunk locomotor patterns.

Authors:  Marilee M Nugent; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Multi-muscle coordination during a challenging stance.

Authors:  Wen-Chieh Yang; Chih-Hsiu Cheng; Hsing-Kuo Wang; Kwan-Hwa Lin; Wei-Li Hsu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Resolving kinematic redundancy in target-reaching movements with and without external constraint.

Authors:  Dongpyo Lee; Daniel M Corcos; Jonathan Shemmell; Sue Leurgans; Ziaul Hasan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Differences in learning volitional (manual) and non-volitional (posture) aspects of a complex motor skill in young adult dyslexic and skilled readers.

Authors:  Itamar Sela; Avi Karni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.