Literature DB >> 11416677

Antihypertensive efficacy of candesartan in comparison to losartan: the CLAIM study.

G Bakris1, A Gradman, M Reif, M Wofford, M Munger, S Harris, J Vendetti, E L Michelson, R Wang.   

Abstract

An 8-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, forced-titration study was conducted to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy of candesartan vs. losartan in 654 hypertensive patients with a diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 114 mm Hg from 72 sites throughout the U.S. Eligible patients were randomized to candesartan cilexetil 16 mg once daily, or losartan 50 mg once daily. Two weeks following randomization, patients doubled the respective doses of their angiotensin receptor blockers for an additional 6 weeks. At week 8, candesartan cilexetil lowered trough systolic/diastolic blood pressure by a significantly greater amount than did losartan (13.3/10.9 mm Hg with candesartan cilexetil vs. 9.8/8.7 mm Hg with losartan; p less than 0.001). At the same period, candesartan cilexetil also lowered peak blood pressure by a significantly greater amount than did losartan (15.2 to 11.6 mm Hg with candesartan cilexetil vs. 12.6 to 10.1 mm Hg with losartan; p less than 0.05). There were statistically significantly (p less than 0.05) higher proportions of responders and controlled patients in the candesartan cilexetil group (62.4% and 56.0%, respectively) than in the losartan group (54.0% and 46.9%, respectively). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated; 1.8% in the candesartan cilexetil group and 1.6% in the losartan group withdrew because of adverse events. In conclusion, this forced-titration study confirms that candesartan cilexetil is more effective than losartan in lowering blood pressure when both are administered once daily at maximum doses. Both drugs were well tolerated. (c)2001 by Le Jacq.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11416677      PMCID: PMC8101876          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2001.00826.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  10 in total

1.  The antihypertensive effect and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil, a new generation angiotensin II antagonist, in comparison with losartan.

Authors:  O K Andersson; S Neldam
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  A comparison of the efficacy and duration of action of candesartan cilexetil and losartan as assessed by clinic and ambulatory blood pressure after a missed dose, in truly hypertensive patients: a placebo-controlled, forced titration study. Candesartan/Losartan study investigators.

Authors:  Y Lacourcière; R Asmar
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Comparative effects of candesartan cilexetil and losartan in patients with systemic hypertension. Candesartan Versus Losartan Efficacy Comparison (CANDLE) Study Group.

Authors:  A H Gradman; A Lewin; B T Bowling; M Tonkon; P C Deedwania; A E Kezer; J D Hardison; D J Cushing; E L Michelson
Journal:  Heart Dis       Date:  1999 May-Jun

4.  National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group report on primary prevention of hypertension.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-01-25

5.  Mechanistic differences of various AT1-receptor blockers in isolated vessels of different origin.

Authors:  P Morsing; G Adler; U Brandt-Eliasson; L Karp; K Ohlson; L Renberg; P O Sjöquist; T Abrahamsson
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 6.  Angiotensin II receptor antagonists.

Authors:  M Burnier; H R Brunner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-02-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Candesartan cilexetil: a review of its preclinical pharmacology.

Authors:  K Nishikawa; T Naka; F Chatani; Y Yoshimura
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 8.  Blood pressure, systolic and diastolic, and cardiovascular risks. US population data.

Authors:  J Stamler; R Stamler; J D Neaton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-03-08

9.  Single-drug therapy for hypertension in men. A comparison of six antihypertensive agents with placebo. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents.

Authors:  B J Materson; D J Reda; W C Cushman; B M Massie; E D Freis; M S Kochar; R J Hamburger; C Fye; R Lakshman; J Gottdiener
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group.

Authors:  L Hansson; A Zanchetti; S G Carruthers; B Dahlöf; D Elmfeldt; S Julius; J Ménard; K H Rahn; H Wedel; S Westerling
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Candesartan cilexetil: an update of its use in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Stephanie E Easthope; Blair Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  The comparative efficacy and safety of the angiotensin receptor blockers in the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Hazel Mae A Abraham; C Michael White; William B White
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Candesartan cilexetil: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in chronic heart failure and hypertension.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.

Authors:  J P Baguet; B Legallicier; P Auquier; S Robitail
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 5.  Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  David H G Smith
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Combination therapy with candesartan cilexetil 32 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg provides the full additive antihypertensive effect of the components: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study in primary care.

Authors:  Istvan Edes
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

7.  Cardiovascular events in subgroups of patients during primary treatment of hypertension with candesartan or losartan.

Authors:  David Russell; Jan Stålhammar; Johan Bodegard; Pål Hasvold; Marcus Thuresson; Sverre E Kjeldsen
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  Valsartan vs. other angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analytical approach.

Authors:  R M Nixon; E Müller; A Lowy; H Falvey
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Is the newest angiotensin-receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil more efficacious in lowering blood pressure than the older ones? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji-Guang Wang; Miao Zhang; Ying-Qing Feng; Chang-Sheng Ma; Tzung-Dau Wang; Zhi-Ming Zhu; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.738

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.