Literature DB >> 11720604

Comparative effects of candesartan cilexetil and losartan in patients with systemic hypertension. Candesartan Versus Losartan Efficacy Comparison (CANDLE) Study Group.

A H Gradman1, A Lewin, B T Bowling, M Tonkon, P C Deedwania, A E Kezer, J D Hardison, D J Cushing, E L Michelson.   

Abstract

The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the novel angiotensin-II (A-II) receptor blocker candesartan cilexetil and the prototype A-II receptor blocker, losartan, were compared in an 8-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, titration-to-effect study of 332 adults (42% women, 12% black) with systemic hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 95-114 mmHg, inclusive). In patients with a mean trough (24 +/- 3 hours after dose) sitting DBP of 90 mmHg or higher after 4 weeks of once daily administration of candesartan 16 mg or losartan 50 mg, dose was titrated up to candesartan 32 mg or losartan 100 mg once daily. The candesartan regimen was significantly more effective than the losartan regimen in reducing trough sitting DBP at week 8 (11.0 mmHg versus 8.9 mmHg). Candesartan also produced numerically greater reductions in secondary blood pressure parameters, including sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP), trough standing DBP and SBP, and peak (6 +/- 2.5 hours after dose) sitting and standing DBP and SBP. Responder rates (sitting DBP < 90 mmHg or reduction in blood pressure of > or = 10 mmHg) and control rates (sitting DBP <90 mmHg) were higher with candesartan (64% versus 54% and 54% versus 43%, respectively). A total of 1.9% of the patients taking candesartan and 6.5% of those taking losartan discontinued prematurely because of adverse events or lack of efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11720604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Dis        ISSN: 1521-737X


  8 in total

Review 1.  Candesartan cilexetil: an update of its use in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Stephanie E Easthope; Blair Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  The comparative efficacy and safety of the angiotensin receptor blockers in the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Hazel Mae A Abraham; C Michael White; William B White
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Candesartan cilexetil: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in chronic heart failure and hypertension.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  David H G Smith
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Comparison of candesartan and felodipine alone and combined in the treatment of hypertension: a single-center, double-blind, randomized, crossover trial.

Authors:  Sanem Nalbantgil; Mehdi Zoghi; Filiz Ozerkan; Bahar Boydak; Istemi Nalbantgil; Remzi Onder; Mustafa Akin
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2003-07

6.  Antihypertensive efficacy of candesartan in comparison to losartan: the CLAIM study.

Authors:  G Bakris; A Gradman; M Reif; M Wofford; M Munger; S Harris; J Vendetti; E L Michelson; R Wang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 7.  Targeting effective blood pressure control with angiotensin receptor blockers.

Authors:  R Asmar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Is the newest angiotensin-receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil more efficacious in lowering blood pressure than the older ones? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji-Guang Wang; Miao Zhang; Ying-Qing Feng; Chang-Sheng Ma; Tzung-Dau Wang; Zhi-Ming Zhu; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.