Literature DB >> 9551878

The antihypertensive effect and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil, a new generation angiotensin II antagonist, in comparison with losartan.

O K Andersson1, S Neldam.   

Abstract

This multicentre study compared the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of the novel angiotensin II antagonist candesartan cilexetil with those of losartan and placebo. Men and women aged 20-80 years, with primary hypertension and sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95-114 mm Hg after a 4-week placebo run-in period, were randomized to once daily double-blind treatment with candesartan cilexetil 8 mg (n=82), candesartan cilexetil 16 mg (n=84), losartan 50 mg (n=83) or placebo (n=85) for 8 weeks. Blood pressure was measured 6 and 24 h after dose, i.e. at peak and trough. Differences between treatments were analysed by analysis of covariance, and the primary effect variable was reduction in trough sitting DBP. Compared with placebo treatment, trough DBP was significantly reduced by a mean (95% CI) of 8.9 (6.0; 11.8) mm Hg with 8 mg and 10.3 (7.4; 13.2) mm Hg with 16 mg candesartan cilexetil. The 8 mg dose was as effective as losartan 50 mg, while 16 mg candesartan cilexetil was significantly more effective, with a difference between treatments of 3.7 (0.8; 6.7) mm Hg (p=0.013). The placebo corrected trough/peak ratio was 0.9-1.1 with candesartan cilexetil and 0.7 with losartan. Candesartan cilexetil was similarly well tolerated as placebo. In conclusion, candesartan cilexetil 8 mg or 16 mg once daily is an effective and well tolerated antihypertensive treatment. Candesartan cilexetil 16 mg is significantly more effective than losartan 50 mg once daily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9551878     DOI: 10.1080/080370598437574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press        ISSN: 0803-7051            Impact factor:   2.835


  22 in total

1.  ACE inhibition and AT(1) receptor blockers: efficacy and duration in hypertension.

Authors:  P A Meredith
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Encapsulation of commercially available losartan for blinding purposes does not affect its bioavailability.

Authors:  L Nyman; K Taure; M Cullberg; P O Lagerström
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 3.  Meta-analyses of antihypertensive therapy: Are some of them misleading?

Authors:  E Grossman; U Goldbourt
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  Therapeutic trials comparing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers.

Authors:  W J Elliott
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  Candesartan cilexetil. A review of its use in essential hypertension.

Authors:  K J McClellan; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Comparative assessment of angiotensin receptor blockers in different clinical settings.

Authors:  Paolo Verdecchia; Fabio Angeli; Salvatore Repaci; Giovanni Mazzotta; Giorgio Gentile; Gianpaolo Reboldi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-11-16

7.  Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.

Authors:  J P Baguet; B Legallicier; P Auquier; S Robitail
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 8.  Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  David H G Smith
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Effects of losartan vs candesartan in reducing cardiovascular events in the primary treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  S E Kjeldsen; J Stålhammar; P Hasvold; J Bodegard; U Olsson; D Russell
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 10.  Valsartan vs. other angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analytical approach.

Authors:  R M Nixon; E Müller; A Lowy; H Falvey
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.