Literature DB >> 10619580

A comparison of the efficacy and duration of action of candesartan cilexetil and losartan as assessed by clinic and ambulatory blood pressure after a missed dose, in truly hypertensive patients: a placebo-controlled, forced titration study. Candesartan/Losartan study investigators.

Y Lacourcière1, R Asmar.   

Abstract

The purpose of this double-blind, forced titration study was to compare the antihypertensive effect duration of candesartan cilexetil, which has a longlasting binding to the human AT1-receptor, to that of losartan on ambulatory BP (ABP) not only during the 24-h dosing interval but also during the day of a missed dose intake. After a 4-week placebo lead-in period, 268 patients with sitting diastolic BP 95 to 110 mm Hg and mean awake ambulatory DBP > or =85 mm Hg were randomized to receive either 8 mg of candesartan, 50 mg of losartan, or placebo for a 4-week period. Thereafter, the doses were doubled in all patients for an additional 4-week period. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed for 36 h after dosing and clinic BP measured 48 h after dosing. Candesartan cilexetil (16 mg) reduced ABP to a significantly greater extent than 100 mg of losartan, particularly for systolic ABP during daytime (P<.05), nighttime (P<.05), and 24-h (P<.01) periods, systolic (P<.01) and diastolic (P<.05) ABP between 0 and 36 h, and both systolic (P<.001) and diastolic (P<0.001) ABP during the day of a missed dose. Clinic BP at 48 h after dosing was significantly reduced exclusively with 16 mg of candesartan. The differences in BP reduction between 8 mg of candesartan and 50 mg of losartan were statistically significant for systolic ABP during daytime (P<.01), nighttime (P<.05), 24-h (P<.01), 0 to 36 h (P<.05) and during the day of missed dose (P<.05). Moreover, although losartan did not significantly reduce ambulatory BP in a dose-related manner, ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP reductions with 16 mg of candesartan were significantly greater (P<.01 and <.001) than those seen with 8 mg of candesartan during every period at the ABP supporting a dose-response relationship. In conclusion, this forced titration study in ambulatory hypertensive patients demonstrates that candesartan cilexetil provides significant dose-dependent reduction in both clinic and ambulatory BP in doses ranging from 8 to 16 mg once daily. Furthermore, candesartan cilexetil is superior to losartan in reducing systolic ABP and in controlling both systolic and diastolic ABP on the day of a missed dose. The differences observed between both agents are most likely attributable to a tighter binding to, and a slower dissociation from, the receptor binding site with candesartan cilexetil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10619580     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00142-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  32 in total

1.  ACE inhibition and AT(1) receptor blockers: efficacy and duration in hypertension.

Authors:  P A Meredith
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Active-learning exercises to teach drug-receptor interactions in a medicinal chemistry course.

Authors:  Seetharama D Satyanarayanajois
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Angiotensin II receptor blockers.

Authors:  Amy Barreras; Cheryle Gurk-Turner
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-01

Review 4.  Behavioral, biological, and chemical perspectives on targeting CRF(1) receptor antagonists to treat alcoholism.

Authors:  Eric P Zorrilla; Markus Heilig; Harriet de Wit; Yavin Shaham
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Antihypertensive treatment in elderly patients aged 75 years or over: a 24-week study of the tolerability of candesartan cilexetil in relation to hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  S Neldam; B Forsén
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Meta-analyses of antihypertensive therapy: Are some of them misleading?

Authors:  E Grossman; U Goldbourt
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Angiotensin vaccination: what is the prospect of success?

Authors:  Duncan J Campbell
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 8.  Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harikrishna Makani; Sripal Bangalore; Azhar Supariwala; Jorge Romero; Edgar Argulian; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 9.  Management of hypertension with fixed dose combinations of candesartan cilexetil and hydrochlorothiazide: patient perspectives and clinical utility.

Authors:  Thomas Mengden; Sakir Uen; Peter Bramlage
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-12-29

10.  Effects of losartan vs candesartan in reducing cardiovascular events in the primary treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  S E Kjeldsen; J Stålhammar; P Hasvold; J Bodegard; U Olsson; D Russell
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.