Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Is opposition to GM crops science or politics? An investigation into the arguments that GM crops pose a particular threat to the environment.

Literature DB >> 11415971

Is opposition to GM crops science or politics? An investigation into the arguments that GM crops pose a particular threat to the environment.

A Trewavas¹, C Leaver.

Abstract

Entities: Chemical

Mesh：

Year: 2001 PMID： 11415971 PMCID： PMC1083916 DOI： 10.1093/embo-reports/kve123

Source DB: PubMed Journal: EMBO Rep ISSN： 1469-221X Impact factor: 8.807

× No keyword cloud information.

7 in total

Review 1. Genetic engineering of crops as potential source of genetic hazard in the human diet.

Authors: A J Conner; J M Jacobs
Journal: Mutat Res Date: 1999-07-15 Impact factor: 2.433

2. Parasitoid behaviour and Bt plants.

Authors: T H Schuler; R P Potting; I Denholm; G M Poppy
Journal: Nature Date: 1999-08-26 Impact factor: 49.962

3. Conventional crops are the test of GM prejudice.

Authors: A Trewavas; C J Leaver
Journal: Nature Date: 1999-10-14 Impact factor: 49.962

4. Transgenic crops in natural habitats.

Authors: M J Crawley; S L Brown; R S Hails; D D Kohn; M Rees
Journal: Nature Date: 2001-02-08 Impact factor: 49.962

5. Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae.

Authors: J E Losey; L S Rayor; M E Carter
Journal: Nature Date: 1999-05-20 Impact factor: 49.962

6. A complete set of maize individual chromosome additions to the oat genome.

Authors: R G Kynast; O Riera-Lizarazu; M I Vales; R J Okagaki; S B Maquieira; G Chen; E V Ananiev; W E Odland; C D Russell; A O Stec; S M Livingston; H A Zaia; H W Rines; R L Phillips
Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 8.340

7. Absence of toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis pollen to black swallowtails under field conditions.

Authors: C L Wraight; A R Zangerl; M J Carroll; M R Berenbaum
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-07-05 Impact factor: 11.205

7 in total

11 in total

1. Science and ethics. As research and technology are changing society and the way we live, scientists can no longer claim that science is neutral but must consider the ethical and social aspects of their work.

Authors: M Iaccarino
Journal: EMBO Rep Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 8.807

2. Of maize and men. Is the endorsement of GM crops science or politics?

Authors: S Flothmann; J van Aken
Journal: EMBO Rep Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 8.807

3. Feeding prejudice. Reluctance within the European Union to accept genetically modified crops may hinder the benefits of this technology reaching the developing world.

Authors: Susan R Owens
Journal: EMBO Rep Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 8.807

Is opposition to GM crops science or politics? An investigation into the arguments that GM crops pose a particular threat to the environment.

Review 1. Genetic engineering of crops as potential source of genetic hazard in the human diet.

2. Parasitoid behaviour and Bt plants.

3. Conventional crops are the test of GM prejudice.

4. Transgenic crops in natural habitats.

5. Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae.

6. A complete set of maize individual chromosome additions to the oat genome.

7. Absence of toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis pollen to black swallowtails under field conditions.

1. Science and ethics. As research and technology are changing society and the way we live, scientists can no longer claim that science is neutral but must consider the ethical and social aspects of their work.

2. Of maize and men. Is the endorsement of GM crops science or politics?

3. Feeding prejudice. Reluctance within the European Union to accept genetically modified crops may hinder the benefits of this technology reaching the developing world.

4. Two sides to the story.

Review 5. Beyond risk. A more realistic risk-benefit analysis of agricultural biotechnologies.

6. Towards a richer debate on tissue engineering: a consideration on the basis of NEST-ethics.

Review 7. Genetically modified crops for the bioeconomy: meeting public and regulatory expectations.

Review 8. Genetically modified plants: public and scientific perceptions.

Review 9. Characterization of scientific studies usually cited as evidence of adverse effects of GM food/feed.

10. All Plant Breeding Technologies Are Equal, but Some Are More Equal Than Others: The Case of GM and Mutagenesis.