Literature DB >> 17701080

Genetically modified crops for the bioeconomy: meeting public and regulatory expectations.

Saharah Moon Chapotin1, Jeffrey D Wolt.   

Abstract

As the United States moves toward a plant-based bioeconomy, a large research and development effort is focused on creating new feedstocks to meet biomass demand for biofuels, bioenergy, and specialized bioproducts, such as industrial compounds and biomaterial precursors. Most bioeconomy projections assume the widespread deployment of novel feedstocks developed through the use of modern molecular breeding techniques, but rarely consider the challenges involved with the use of genetically modified crops, which can include hurdles due to regulatory approvals, market adoption, and public acceptance. In this paper we consider the implications of various transgenic crops and traits under development for the bioeconomy that highlight these challenges. We believe that an awareness of the issues in crop and trait selection will allow developers to design crops with maximum stakeholder appeal and with the greatest potential for widespread adoption, while avoiding applications unlikely to meet regulatory approval or gain market and public acceptance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17701080     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-007-9122-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   3.145


  46 in total

1.  The Bush administration deals a blow to biotechnology--and itself.

Authors:  H I Miller
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Transgenic organisms--time for conceptual diversification?

Authors:  Kaare M Nielsen
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Puzzling industry response to ProdiGene fiasco.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Fox
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Metabolic engineering.

Authors:  R Michael Raab; Keith Tyo; Gregory Stephanopoulos
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.635

Review 5.  Biotechnology and the domestication of forest trees.

Authors:  Wout Boerjan
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.740

6.  Regulatory slowdown on GM crop decisions.

Authors:  Gregory Jaffe
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Sugar cane and ethanol: drink the best and drive the rest.

Authors:  Emma Marris
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Agbiotech booms in emerging nations.

Authors:  Stacy Lawrence
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 9.  Biotechnological processes for conversion of corn into ethanol.

Authors:  R J Bothast; M A Schlicher
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Plant-derived pharmaceuticals--the road forward.

Authors:  Julian K-C Ma; Rachel Chikwamba; Penny Sparrow; Rainer Fischer; Richard Mahoney; Richard M Twyman
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 18.313

View more
  6 in total

1.  Will GM animals follow the GM plant fate?

Authors:  Núria Vàzquez-Salat; Louis-Marie Houdebine
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 2.  RNA interference: concept to reality in crop improvement.

Authors:  Satyajit Saurabh; Ambarish S Vidyarthi; Dinesh Prasad
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Advancing environmental risk assessment for transgenic biofeedstock crops.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 4.  Environmental risk assessments for transgenic crops producing output trait enzymes.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Ann Tuttle; Scott Shore; Terry Stone
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Regulatory Uncertainty Around New Breeding Techniques.

Authors:  Rim Lassoued; Stuart J Smyth; Peter W B Phillips; Hayley Hesseln
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 6.  The Regulatory Status of Genome-edited Crops.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt; Kan Wang; Bing Yang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 9.803

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.