Literature DB >> 11409412

The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century. A discussion of critical design elements.

D M Herron1, M Gagner, T L Kenyon, L L Swanström.   

Abstract

Most minimally invasive surgical procedures are now performed in operating rooms that were originally designed for traditional open surgery. Laparoscopic instrumentation such as insufflators, light sources, and camera control units must be placed on one or more equipment carts. After the cart has been moved into place, insufflation tubing, video cables, light cords, cautery lines, and foot controls must be positioned and connected. This cart-based paradigm restricts the ergonomic configuration of the operating room and creates potential mechanical, electrical, and biological hazards to the patient and operating room staff. In order to decrease clutter, ease personnel movement, improve ergonomics, maintain the sterile field, and facilitate the use of advanced imaging, communication, and display devices, an appropriately designed operating environment is essential. Herein we detail both the theoretical and practical aspects of the design and describe the implementation and utilization of such a suite in our hospital. These design elements may prove to be critical to the next generation of minimally invasive surgical suites and will facilitate future advanced laparoscopic procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11409412     DOI: 10.1007/s004640080134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  Long distance telementoring. A novel tool for laparoscopy aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln.

Authors:  M Cubano; B K Poulose; M A Talamini; R Stewart; L E Antosek; R Lentz; R Nibe; M F Kutka; M Mendoza-Sagaon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  New ORs built to adapt to change.

Authors:  J M Mathias
Journal:  OR Manager       Date:  1999-05

3.  The integrated operating room system - a pathway to the or 2000 and beyond.

Authors:  T Reichert; D Birrenbach
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  1998

4.  Evaluating the human engineering of microprocessor-controlled operating room devices.

Authors:  R I Cook; S S Potter; D D Woods; J S McDonald
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-07

5.  Head-mounted video monitor for global visual access in mini-invasive surgery. An initial report.

Authors:  W P Geis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A comparison of operating room crowding between open and laparoscopic operations.

Authors:  A Alarcon; R Berguer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments.

Authors:  R Berguer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The 3-D monitor and head-mounted display. A quantitative evaluation of advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies.

Authors:  D M Herron; J C Lantis; J Maykel; C Basu; S D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  MIS instruments. An experimental comparison of various ergonomic handles and their design.

Authors:  U Matern; M Eichenlaub; P Waller; K Rückauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Lloyd-Davies position with Trendelenburg--a disaster waiting to happen?

Authors:  A F Horgan; S Geddes; I G Finlay
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  13 in total

1.  The operating room of the future: what, when and why?

Authors:  G Berci; E H Phillips; F Fujita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Technologies and solutions for data display in the operating room.

Authors:  Noemi Bitterman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Understanding and optimizing laparoscopic videosystems.

Authors:  H Rivas; R Cacchione; J W Allen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The feasibility of introducing advanced minimally invasive surgery into surgical practice.

Authors:  Daniel W Birch; Monali Misra; Forough Farrokhyar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; M A van Veelen; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Interoperative efficiency in minimally invasive surgery suites.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Canadian consensus conference on the development of training and practice standards in advanced minimally invasive surgery: Edmonton, Alta., Jun. 1, 2007.

Authors:  Daniel W Birch; H Jaap Bonjer; Claire Crossley; Gayle Burnett; Chris de Gara; Anthony Gomes; John Hagen; Angus G Maciver; C Dale Mercer; O Neely Panton; Chris M Schlachta; Andy J Smith; Garth L Warnock
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Endo-Lap OR: an innovative "minimally invasive operating room" design.

Authors:  J C-H Wong; K K Yau; C C-C Chung; W T Siu; M K-W Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Risk-sensitive events during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the influence of the integrated operating room and a preoperative checklist tool.

Authors:  Sonja N Buzink; Lotte van Lier; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; E R Totté; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.