Literature DB >> 9569372

Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments.

R Berguer1.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery provides patients with less painful surgery and a more rapid recovery, while requiring that surgeons work harder and in a more remote manner from the operating field. Cost-containment pressures on surgeons demand efficient surgery, whereas the increased technological complexity and sometimes poorly adapted equipment have led to increased complaints of surgeon fatigue and discomfort during laparoscopic surgery. There is, therefore, a need to evaluate the ergonomic integration and suitability of the laparoscopic operating room environment to address the issues of efficiency, safety, and comfort for the operating team. This approach is particularly important in the design of laparoscopic surgical instruments. A review of the literature on the biomechanics of laparoscopic surgical instrument use was combined with data from the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Ergonomics Questionnaire and demonstration station. Laparoscopic instruments suffer from ergonomically inadequate handle designs and inefficient handle to tip force transmission, which lead to surgeon fatigue, discomfort, and hand paresthesias. Improvements in the design of laparoscopic instruments are needed to decrease the work and discomfort of tissue manipulation during video-endoscopic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9569372     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  37 in total

1.  The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century. A discussion of critical design elements.

Authors:  D M Herron; M Gagner; T L Kenyon; L L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Improvement of the laparoscopic needle holder based on new ergonomic guidelines.

Authors:  M A van Veelen; D W Meijer; I Uijttewaal; R H M Goossens; C J Snijders; G Kazemier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  M A van Veelen; E A L Nederlof; R H M Goossens; C J Schot; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of two actuation systems for laparoscopic surgical manipulators using motion analysis.

Authors:  Yogesh Vinod Kolwadkar; Stuart I Brown; Rami J Abboud; Weijie Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robot assisted adrenalectomy: a handy tool or glorified obsession?

Authors:  Mrinal Pahwa
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-08

6.  Hand movements in laparoscopic suturing: a simple vector analysis.

Authors:  A J Hansen; R T Schlinkert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: an assessment of performance and muscle fatigue.

Authors:  S K Maithel; L Villegas; N Stylopoulos; S Dawson; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons.

Authors:  L S G L Wauben; M A van Veelen; D Gossot; R H M Goossens
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Ergonomics with the use of curved versus straight laparoscopic graspers during rectosigmoid resection: results of a multiprofile comparative study.

Authors:  G A Manukyan; M Waseda; N Inaki; J R Torres Bermudez; I A Gacek; A Rudinski; G F Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic intracorporal colorectal sutured anastomosis using the Radius Surgical System in a phantom model.

Authors:  J R Torres Bermudez; G Buess; M Waseda; I Gacek; F Becerra Garcia; G A Manukyan; N Inaki; N Inaky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.