Literature DB >> 16699740

Technologies and solutions for data display in the operating room.

Noemi Bitterman1.   

Abstract

Recent advances in technology have led to the introduction of a variety of innovative devices, each with their own platform for data display, into the operating room (OR). While these innovative applications are expanding the traditional boundaries of the surgical space and enhancing treatment capabilities, the introduction of additional screens and displays is placing an ever-increasing load on the OR team. This review describes the main data display platforms currently available in ORs: computer monitors with CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) screens, suspended imaging displays, wearable computers (WC), auditory displays and tactile (haptic) displays. The different display platforms are evaluated according to their compatibility with the characteristics of the working environment (OR), the monitoring task, and the users (the surgical team). No single display configuration provides an ultimate solution for presenting patient data in the OR. A multi-sensory data display including visual, acoustic and haptic manipulation is suggested as a promising configuration for data display in the OR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16699740     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-006-9017-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  50 in total

1.  Visual Displays and Visual Perception in Minimal Access Surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  1995-09

2.  Good vibrations: tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human-automation coordination in event-driven domains.

Authors:  A E Sklar; N B Sarter
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  A laboratory evaluation of an auditory display designed to enhance intraoperative monitoring.

Authors:  Robert G Loeb; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 4.  Advanced devices for the operating room of the future.

Authors:  David W Rattner; Adrian Park
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2003-06

Review 5.  Disruptive visions: a robot is not a machine...systems integration for surgeons.

Authors:  R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Implications of automation surprises in aviation for the future of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA).

Authors:  R I Cook; D D Woods
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.452

7.  A second time-study of the anaesthetist's intraoperative period.

Authors:  J S McDonald; R Dzwonczyk; B Gupta; M Dahl
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  A time and motion study of the anaesthetist's intraoperative time.

Authors:  J S McDonald; R R Dzwonczyk
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Clinical evaluation of the 'head-up' display of anesthesia data. Preliminary communication.

Authors:  F E Block; D O Yablok; J S McDonald
Journal:  Int J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1995-02

10.  Muscular strain and fatigue among urologists during transurethral resections using direct and monitor endoscopy.

Authors:  A Luttmann; J Sökeland; W Laurig
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sketching Awareness: A Participatory Study to Elicit Designs for Supporting Ad Hoc Emergency Medical Teamwork.

Authors:  Diana Kusunoki; Aleksandra Sarcevic; Zhan Zhang; Maria Yala
Journal:  Comput Support Coop Work       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.825

Review 2.  A survey of context recognition in surgery.

Authors:  Igor Pernek; Alois Ferscha
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.602

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.