Literature DB >> 8703151

A comparison of operating room crowding between open and laparoscopic operations.

A Alarcon1, R Berguer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clutter of equipment and lines in today's operating room (O.R.) is increasing. Endoscopic surgical procedures are particularly afflicted by this problem because they require additional equipment. Increasing O.R. crowding may present unnecessary hazards to traffic and adversely affect the performance of the surgical team. The purpose of this study is to provide a quantitative summary of the furniture, equipment, cables, and tubes present during open and laparoscopic operations.
METHODS: We prospectively studied an unselected series of general surgical open (OP, n = 10) and laparoscopic (LAP, n = 10) operations performed at a major university teaching hospital. We recorded the location of all furniture and equipment as well as the source, course, and destination of all cables and tubes in the O.R. Cables and tubes touching the surgeon or the assistant were particularly noted. Results are expressed as median values for each group.
RESULTS: The percent of O.R. space occupied increased from OP = 36% to LAP = 41% (p < 0.002). The median number of cables and tubes present increased from OP = 27 to LAP = 34 (p < 0.0002), with the number of these lines touching a member of the surgical team increasing from OP = 2 to LAP = 6 (p < 0.0003).
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there is a significant trend toward increasing O.R. crowding during laparoscopic surgery. Innovative designs will be needed to reduce clutter in the O.R. of the future.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8703151     DOI: 10.1007/BF00188483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  11 in total

1.  Operating-room design: an introduction.

Authors:  G Klebanoff
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  1979-11

2.  Operating theatre feature: some guidelines.

Authors:  P Rogers
Journal:  Hosp Dev       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug

3.  OR environment: a surgeon's view.

Authors:  P F Nora
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 0.676

4.  The operating room of the future. Report of the National Cancer Institute Workshop, "Imaging-Guided Stereotactic Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment".

Authors:  F A Jolesz; F Shtern
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Operating room setup and instrumentation.

Authors:  S P Boyers
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  Architectural and engineering aspects of the operating room environment.

Authors:  H Laufman
Journal:  Bull Soc Int Chir       Date:  1974 Jan-Feb

7.  What's wrong with our operating rooms?

Authors:  H Laufman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Improved coordination makes for faster work. Ergonomic analysis of a trauma resuscitation room.

Authors:  H Smith; P McIntosh; A Sverisdottir; C Robertson
Journal:  Prof Nurse       Date:  1993-08

9.  Technology and the surgical suite: forest of instrumentation improves, but complicates, surgical practice.

Authors:  S G Kernaghan
Journal:  Hospitals       Date:  1982-03-16

10.  The ceiling-retractable service column.

Authors:  R J Wilder; G R Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-09-25       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  18 in total

1.  The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century. A discussion of critical design elements.

Authors:  D M Herron; M Gagner; T L Kenyon; L L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The operating room of the future: what, when and why?

Authors:  G Berci; E H Phillips; F Fujita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Evaluation of the 10-year history of a 2-day standardized laparoscopic surgical skills training program at Kyushu University.

Authors:  Morimasa Tomikawa; Munenori Uemura; Hajime Kenmotsu; Kozo Konishi; Kenoki Ohuchida; Ken Okazaki; Satoshi Ieiri; Kazuo Tanoue; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Technologies and solutions for data display in the operating room.

Authors:  Noemi Bitterman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  A newly designed ergonomic body support for surgeons.

Authors:  A Albayrak; M A van Veelen; J F Prins; C J Snijders; H de Ridder; G Kazemier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A quantitative study of disruption in the operating room during laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Danny V Martinec; Maria A Cassera; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Interoperative efficiency in minimally invasive surgery suites.

Authors:  M J van Det; W J H J Meijerink; C Hoff; J P E N Pierie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among vaginal surgeons.

Authors:  Shunaha Kim-Fine; Sandra M Woolley; Amy L Weaver; Jill M Killian; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Occupational health related concerns among surgeons.

Authors:  Anjuman Gul Memon; Zahid Naeem; Atif Zaman; Faryal Zahid
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2016-04

10.  Risk-sensitive events during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the influence of the integrated operating room and a preoperative checklist tool.

Authors:  Sonja N Buzink; Lotte van Lier; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.