Literature DB >> 9143611

Assessing participation bias in a sexual behaviour survey: implications for measuring HIV risk.

A J Copas1, A M Johnson, J Wadsworth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the likelihood of participation bias in a large population-based sex survey, and its possible effect on estimates of HIV risk behaviours.
DESIGN: Construction of general hypotheses about non-participants through comparisons of willing and unwilling participants.
METHODS: British adults aged 16-59 years were surveyed in 1990-1991. Interviews consisted of a face-to-face section combined with a self-completion booklet (n = 18876). Interviewers recorded interviewee embarrassment. Homosexual experience and number of lifetime heterosexual partners (grouped 0, 1, 2 or more) were recorded prior to booklet offer. Logistic regression was performed, with embarrassment and booklet refusal as outcome variables, assessing their association with sexual behaviour after controlling for demographic variables. Assuming that, in sexual behaviour, non-participants are closer to the embarrased and the booklet refusers ('unwilling' participants) than to others, these analyses provide an indication of the nature of participation bias.
RESULTS: Higher refusal an embarrassment rates were associated with both reporting no homosexual experience and fewer heterosexual partners.
CONCLUSIONS: Under our untestable assumption, these results are consistent with non-participants being generally at lower risk of HIV infection. Methods need to be developed both to reduce participation bias in sex surveys, and to incorporate it in analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9143611     DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199706000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS        ISSN: 0269-9370            Impact factor:   4.177


  12 in total

Review 1.  Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research.

Authors:  K A Fenton; A M Johnson; S McManus; B Erens
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  The acceptability of urinary LCR testing for Chlamydia trachomatis among participants in a probability sample survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles.

Authors:  K A Fenton; A Copas; K Mitchell; G Elam; C Carder; G Ridgway; K Wellings; B Erens; J Field; A M Johnson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.519

3. 

Authors:  Walter H Curioso; Magaly M Blas; Ann E Kurth; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica       Date:  2007-07-27

4.  Why Do Parents Grant or Deny Consent for Adolescent Participation in Sexuality Research?

Authors:  Kristin L Moilanen
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-02-24

5.  Social and Proximate Determinants of the Frequency of Condom Use Among African, Caribbean, and Other Black People in a Canadian City: Results from the BLACCH Study.

Authors:  Shamara Baidoobonso; Greta R Bauer; Kathy Nixon Speechley; Erica Lawson
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2016-02

6.  The accuracy of reported sensitive sexual behaviour in Britain: exploring the extent of change 1990-2000.

Authors:  A J Copas; K Wellings; B Erens; C H Mercer; S McManus; K A Fenton; C Korovessis; W Macdowall; K Nanchahal; A M Johnson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Health and demographic characteristics of respondents in an Australian national sexuality survey: comparison with population norms.

Authors:  D M Purdie; M P Dunne; F M Boyle; M D Cook; J M Najman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Consistency in the reporting of sexual behaviour by adolescent girls in Kenya: a comparison of interviewing methods.

Authors:  P C Hewett; B S Mensch; A S Erulkar
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Impact of community-based interventions on condom use in the Tłįcho region of Northwest Territories, Canada.

Authors:  Karen E Edwards; Nancy Gibson; Jim Martin; Steven Mitchell; Neil Andersson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Modelling the impact of antiretroviral use in resource-poor settings.

Authors:  Rebecca F Baggaley; Geoff P Garnett; Neil M Ferguson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.