Literature DB >> 9153741

The promise of integrated representative surveys about sexually transmitted diseases and behavior.

L Ku1, F L Sonenstein, C F Turner, S O Aral, C M Black.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been difficult to conduct representative surveys measuring both sexually transmitted disease prevalence and behavioral data. This article reviews the literature, describes a recent pretest of the feasibility of integrated surveys, and discusses the potential implications.
METHODS: Several national surveys are reviewed, including the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Health and Social Life Survey, and National Survey of Adolescent Males. The 1994 pretest of the National Survey of Adolescent Males collected urine specimens of male respondents, which were tested for Chlamydia trachomatis using ligase and polymerase chain reaction tests.
RESULTS: There have not been any prior national surveys that collect clinical measures of STD infection and detailed behavioral data. In the pretest, 85% of the eligible interview respondents provided a urine specimen. Of those tested, 6% were positive for C. trachomatis.
CONCLUSIONS: Combining behavioral surveys with collection of urine specimens for STD testing in representative samples is feasible. However, STD testing adds new operational and ethical challenges to the conduct of household surveys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9153741     DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199705000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  6 in total

1.  The acceptability of urinary LCR testing for Chlamydia trachomatis among participants in a probability sample survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles.

Authors:  K A Fenton; A Copas; K Mitchell; G Elam; C Carder; G Ridgway; K Wellings; B Erens; J Field; A M Johnson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Risk behaviors, medical care, and chlamydial infection among young men in the United States.

Authors:  Leighton Ku; Michael St Louis; Carol Farshy; Sevgi Aral; Charles F Turner; Laura D Lindberg; Freya Sonenstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Decision analysis: point-of-care Chlamydia testing vs. laboratory-based methods.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Swain; Roberta A McDonald; John R Pfister; M Stephen Gradus; Gerald V Sedmak; Ajaib Singh
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2004-02

4.  Chlamydia trachomatis infections in multi-ethnic urban youth: a pilot combining STI health education and outreach testing in Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Authors:  H M Götz; I K Veldhuijzen; J M Ossewaarde; O de Zwart; J H Richardus
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  LCR testing for gonorrhoea and chlamydia in population surveys and other screenings of low prevalence populations: coping with decreased positive predictive value.

Authors:  J M Zenilman; W C Miller; C Gaydos; S M Rogers; C F Turner
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Urine-based testing for Chlamydia trachomatis among young adults in a population-based survey in Croatia: feasibility and prevalence.

Authors:  Ivana Božičević; Ivana Grgić; Snježana Židovec-Lepej; Jurja-Ivana Čakalo; Sanja Belak-Kovačević; Aleksandar Štulhofer; Josip Begovac
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.