Literature DB >> 11397535

A comparison of the hemolytic potential of Optison and Albunex in whole human blood in vitro: acoustic pressure, ultrasound frequency, donor and passive cavitation detection considerations.

M W Miller1, E C Everbach, C Cox, R R Knapp, A A Brayman, T A Sherman.   

Abstract

This project tested the hypothesis that a "second-generation" ultrasound (US) contrast agent (Optison), offering extended echogenicity over that of its "first-generation" predecessor (Albunex), would have the greater potential for sonolysis of human erythrocytes in vitro. Whole human blood, obtained from apparently healthy donors, was anticoagulated and subsequently exposed in vitro to US in the presence of one of each or neither of the two US contrast agents. The US exposures were for 30 s and involved frequency (1.0, 2.2 and 3.4 MHz) and amplitude (approximately 2.8 to 0.38 MPa P(-)) regimens; pulse duration (200 micros) and interpulse interval (20 ms) were held constant. The data supported the hypothesis, with an overall ratio of approximately 2.5 for relative extent of background-corrected US-induced hemolysis of the Optison/Albunex regimens. Passive cavitation detection analyses corroborated the results obtained with hemolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11397535     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(01)00356-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  6 in total

1.  Optimization of low-frequency low-intensity ultrasound-mediated microvessel disruption on prostate cancer xenografts in nude mice using an orthogonal experimental design.

Authors:  Y U Yang; Wenkun Bai; Yini Chen; Yanduan Lin; Bing Hu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  An ex vivo study of the correlation between acoustic emission and microvascular damage.

Authors:  Stanley Samuel; Michol A Cooper; Joseph L Bull; J Brian Fowlkes; Douglas L Miller
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Image-guided ultrasound phased arrays are a disruptive technology for non-invasive therapy.

Authors:  Kullervo Hynynen; Ryan M Jones
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Perspective on ultrasound bioeffects and possible implications for continuous post-dive monitoring safety.

Authors:  Erica P McCune; David Q Le; Peter Lindholm; Kathryn R Nightingale; Paul A Dayton; Virginie Papadopoulou
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 1.228

5.  A microbubble agent improves the therapeutic efficiency of high intensity focused ultrasound: a rabbit kidney study.

Authors:  Tinghe Yu; Guoyun Wang; Kai Hu; Ping Ma; Jin Bai; Zhibiao Wang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2003-12-04

6.  Focused Ultrasound-Induced Cavitation Sensitizes Cancer Cells to Radiation Therapy and Hyperthermia.

Authors:  Shaonan Hu; Xinrui Zhang; Michael Unger; Ina Patties; Andreas Melzer; Lisa Landgraf
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 6.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.