Literature DB >> 35732286

Perspective on ultrasound bioeffects and possible implications for continuous post-dive monitoring safety.

Erica P McCune1, David Q Le1, Peter Lindholm2, Kathryn R Nightingale3, Paul A Dayton1, Virginie Papadopoulou1,4.   

Abstract

Ultrasound monitoring, both in the form of Doppler and 2D echocardiography, has been used post-dive to detect decompression bubbles circulating in the bloodstream. With large variability in both bubble time course and loads, it has been hypothesised that shorter periods between imaging, or even continuous imaging, could provide more accurate post-dive assessments. However, while considering applications of ultrasound imaging post-decompression, it may also be prudent to consider the possibility of ultrasound-induced bioeffects. Clinical ultrasound studies using microbubble contrast agents have shown bioeffect generation with acoustic powers much lower than those used in post-dive monitoring. However, to date no studies have specifically investigated potential bioeffect generation from continuous post-dive echocardiography. This review discusses what can be drawn from the current ultrasound and diving literature on the safety of bubble sonication and highlights areas where more studies are needed. An overview of the ultrasound-bubble mechanisms that lead to bioeffects and analyses of ultrasound contrast agent studies on bioeffect generation in the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems are provided to illustrate how bubbles under ultrasound can cause damage within the body. Along with clinical ultrasound studies, studies investigating the effects of decompression bubbles under ultrasound are analysed and open questions regarding continuous post-dive monitoring safety are discussed. Copyright: This article is the copyright of the authors who grant Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine a non-exclusive licence to publish the article in electronic and other forms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bubbles; Cavitation; Decompression; Decompression research; Venous gas emboli

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35732286      PMCID: PMC9522608          DOI: 10.28920/dhm52.2.136-148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med        ISSN: 1833-3516            Impact factor:   1.228


  97 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound.

Authors:  Diane Dalecki
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 2.  The need for optimisation of post-dive ultrasound monitoring to properly evaluate the evolution of venous gas emboli.

Authors:  S Lesley Blogg; Mikael Gennser
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.887

Review 3.  Overview of experimental studies of biological effects of medical ultrasound caused by gas body activation and inertial cavitation.

Authors:  Douglas L Miller
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 4.  Bioeffects considerations for diagnostic ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Douglas L Miller; Michalakis A Averkiou; Andrew A Brayman; E Carr Everbach; Christy K Holland; James H Wible; Junru Wu
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Direct in vivo visualization of intravascular destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound and its local effects on tissue.

Authors:  D M Skyba; R J Price; A Z Linka; T C Skalak; S Kaul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-07-28       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  The use of portable 2D echocardiography and 'frame-based' bubble counting as a tool to evaluate diving decompression stress.

Authors:  Peter Germonpré; Virginie Papadopoulou; Walter Hemelryck; Georges Obeid; Pierre Lafère; Robert J Eckersley; Meng-Xing Tang; Costantino Balestra
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.887

7.  Variability in circulating gas emboli after a same scuba diving exposure.

Authors:  V Papadopoulou; P Germonpré; D Cosgrove; R J Eckersley; P A Dayton; G Obeid; A Boutros; M-X Tang; S Theunissen; C Balestra
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 8.  Potential adverse ultrasound-related biological effects: a critical review.

Authors:  Hariharan Shankar; Paul S Pagel
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Biological and environmental factors affecting ultrasound-induced hemolysis in vitro: 2. Medium dissolved gas (pO2) content.

Authors:  Morton W Miller; E Carr Everbach; W Marcus Miller; Linda F Battaglia
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Mouse lung damage from exposure to 30 kHz ultrasound.

Authors:  W D O'Brien; J F Zachary
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.