Literature DB >> 7580710

Patients' views of priority setting in health care: an interview survey in one practice.

A Dicker1, D Armstrong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the assumptions underlying consumers' responses to questions of resource priorities in the NHS.
DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with a heterogeneous sample of 16 patients drawn from a general practice.
RESULTS: Interviewees were not persuaded that they had a legitimate role to play in the prioritisation of services. They supported the principle of equity and were reluctant to use their own personal needs as a basis for resource allocation; instead they argued from what they perceived to be the needs of others.
CONCLUSIONS: Paradoxically, surveys of consumers' views on health care priorities probably do not elicit the personal ideas of respondents but tap into a more general ideological position closer to an earlier collectivist notion of health care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7580710      PMCID: PMC2551058          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  1 in total

1.  Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district.

Authors:  A Bowling; B Jacobson; L Southgate
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.634

  1 in total
  17 in total

1.  The UMDS MSc in general practice: attainment of intended outcomes.

Authors:  G Calvert; N Britten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting.

Authors:  Andreas Hasman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-03

Review 3.  Citizen deliberation in setting health-care priorities.

Authors:  Norma Jean Murphy
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Rationing health care: moving the debate forward.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-22

5.  Rationing: a transatlantic perspective.

Authors:  S Purdy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Insurance benefit preferences of the low-income uninsured.

Authors:  Marion Danis; Andrea K Biddle; Susan Dorr Goold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Patient's views of priority setting. Details of qualitative studies are needed.

Authors:  S Perry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-02-17

8.  A qualitative study of patients' views on anxiety and depression.

Authors:  U T Kadam; P Croft; J McLeod; M Hutchinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  A study on the ethics of microallocation of scarce resources in health care.

Authors:  P A de Carvalho Fortes; E L C P Zoboli
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Assessing Patient Participation in Health Policy Decision-Making in Cyprus.

Authors:  Kyriakos Souliotis; Eirini Agapidaki; Lily Evangelia Peppou; Chara Tzavara; George Samoutis; Mamas Theodorou
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.