Literature DB >> 16793783

Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study.

Mala Rao1, Aileen Clarke, Colin Sanderson, Richard Hammersley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relation between older patients' assessments of the quality of their primary care and measures of good clinical practice on the basis of data from administrative and clinical records.
DESIGN: Cross sectional population based study using the general practice assessment survey.
SETTING: 18 general practices in the Basildon primary care trust area, south east England. PARTICIPANTS: 3487 people aged 65 or more. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlations between mean practice scores on the general practice assessment survey and three evidence based measures on survey of case records (monitoring for, and control of, hypertension, and vaccination against influenza).
RESULTS: 76% of people (3487/4563) responded to the general practice assessment survey. Correlations between patient assessed survey scores for technical quality and the objective records based measures of good clinical practice were 0.22 (95% confidence interval -0.28 to 0.62) for hypertension monitored, 0.30 (-0.19 to 0.67) for hypertension controlled, and -0.05 (-0.50 to 0.43) for influenza vaccination.
CONCLUSIONS: Older patients' assessments are not a sufficient basis for assessing the technical quality of their primary care. For an overall assessment both patient based and records based measures are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16793783      PMCID: PMC1488754          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38874.499167.7C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  16 in total

1.  User involvement and the NHS reforms.

Authors:  Penny Rhodes; Andrew Nocon
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  National quality monitoring of Medicare health plans: the relationship between enrollees' reports and the quality of clinical care.

Authors:  E C Schneider; A M Zaslavsky; B E Landon; T R Lied; S Sheingold; P D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties.

Authors:  J Ramsay; J L Campbell; S Schroter; J Green; M Roland
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care--a major experiment in the United kingdom.

Authors:  Martin Roland
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Quality assessment in health.

Authors:  R J Maxwell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-05-12

6.  Users' understanding of medical knowledge in general practice.

Authors:  Alison Chapple; Stephen Campbell; Anne Rogers; Martin Roland
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  The development of a routine NHS data-based index of performance in general practice (NHSPPI).

Authors:  David J Heaney; Jeremy J Walker; John G R Howie; Margaret Maxwell; George K Freeman; Peter N E Berrey; Tom G Jones; Morag C Stern; Stephen M Campbell
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Public preferences for health care: prioritisation in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Darren Shickle
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1997 Jul-Oct       Impact factor: 1.898

9.  Management guidelines in essential hypertension: report of the second working party of the British Hypertension Society.

Authors:  P Sever; G Beevers; C Bulpitt; A Lever; L Ramsay; J Reid; J Swales
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-10

10.  The association between satisfaction with services provided in primary care and outcomes in Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M H Alazri; R D Neal
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.359

View more
  43 in total

1.  Structural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multisite patient navigation research program study.

Authors:  Pascal Jean-Pierre; Kevin Fiscella; Karen M Freund; Jack Clark; Julie Darnell; Alan Holden; Douglas Post; Steven R Patierno; Paul C Winters
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Associations between technical quality of diabetes care and patient experience.

Authors:  Onyebuchi A Arah; Bastiaan Roset; Diana M J Delnoij; Niek S Klazinga; Karien Stronks
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Can patients assess the quality of health care?

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-07-01

4.  Patient involvement in health care will improve quality.

Authors:  Robert Hunter; Rosie Cameron
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-07-15

5.  Incentives to increase patient satisfaction: are we doing more harm than good?

Authors:  Jay Detsky; Randi Zlotnik Shaul
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ron D Hays; William G Lehrman; Lise Rybowski; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  The relationship between patients' perception of care and measures of hospital quality and safety.

Authors:  Thomas Isaac; Alan M Zaslavsky; Paul D Cleary; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Patient satisfaction in outpatient cancer care: a prospective survey using The PASQOC questionnaire.

Authors:  Ulrich R Kleeberg; Petra Feyer; Wolfram Günther; Monika Behrens
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK--development and psychometric characteristics.

Authors:  John Campbell; Patten Smith; Sonja Nissen; Peter Bower; Marc Elliott; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Women's experiences and views about costs of seeking malaria chemoprevention and other antenatal services: a qualitative study from two districts in rural Tanzania.

Authors:  Godfrey M Mubyazi; Paul Bloch; Pascal Magnussen; Øystein E Olsen; Jens Byskov; Kristian S Hansen; Ib C Bygbjerg
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.