Literature DB >> 11384564

Risk factors for progression of visual field abnormalities in normal-tension glaucoma.

S Drance1, D R Anderson, M Schulzer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To uncover risk factors for the highly variable individual rates of progression in cases of untreated normal-tension glaucoma.
METHODS: Visual field data were assembled from 160 subjects (160 eyes) enrolled in the collaborative normal-tension glaucoma study during intervals in which the eye under study was not receiving intraocular pressure-lowering treatment during prerandomization and postrandomization intervals. Analyses included multivariate analysis of time-dependent Cox proportional hazard, Kaplan-Meier analysis of "survival" without an increment of visual field worsening, and comparison of slopes of change in mean deviation global index over time.
RESULTS: Most migraine occurred in women, but analysis demonstrated that gender and presence of migraine contribute separately to the overall risk. The risk ratio for migraine, adjusted for the other variables was 2.58 (P =.0058), for disk hemorrhage was 2.72 (P =.0036), and for female gender 1.85 (P =.0622). The average fall in the mean deviation index was faster in nonmigrainous women than in nonmigrainous men (P =.05). Suggesting genetic influence, Asians had a slower rate of progression (P =.005), and the few black patients enrolled had a tendency for faster progression. However, self-declared history of family with glaucoma or treated for glaucoma did not affect the rate of progression. Neither age nor the untreated level of intraocular pressure affected the rate of untreated disease progression, despite their known influence on prevalence.
CONCLUSIONS: Whereas risk factors for prevalence help select populations within which to screen for glaucoma, the factors that affect the rate of progression help decide the expected prognosis of the individual's untreated disease and thereby the frequency of follow-up and aggressiveness of the therapy to be undertaken.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11384564     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)00964-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  197 in total

1.  Effect of treatment on the rate of visual field change in the ocular hypertension treatment study observation group.

Authors:  Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Shaban Demirel; Stuart K Gardiner; Jeffrey M Liebmann; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Are rates of vision loss in patients in English glaucoma clinics slowing down over time? Trends from a decade of data.

Authors:  T Boodhna; L J Saunders; D P Crabb
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Comparison of visual field progression between temporally tilted disc and nontilted disc, in patients with normal tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Y J Choy; Y Kwun; J C Han; C Kee
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Normal visual field test results following glaucomatous visual field end points in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Authors:  John L Keltner; Chris A Johnson; Richard A Levine; Juanjuan Fan; Kimberly E Cello; Michael A Kass; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09

5.  Retinal vein pulsation predicts increasing optic disc excavation.

Authors:  Marcelo T Nicolela
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Disc Hemorrhages Are Associated With the Presence and Progression of Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects.

Authors:  Aakriti G Shukla; Portia E Sirinek; C Gustavo De Moraes; Dana M Blumberg; George A Cioffi; Alon Skaat; Christopher A Girkin; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Donald C Hood; Jeffrey M Liebmann
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Discrepancy between optic disc and nerve fiber layer assessment and optical coherence tomography in detecting glaucomatous progression.

Authors:  Jong Rak Lee; Kyung Rim Sung; Jung Hwa Na; Kilhwan Shon; Kyoung Sub Lee
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Five-year forecasts of the Visual Field Index (VFI) with binocular and monocular visual fields.

Authors:  Ryo Asaoka; Richard A Russell; Rizwan Malik; David F Garway-Heath; David P Crabb
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  Perceptive aspects of visual aura.

Authors:  Carlo Aleci; William Liboni
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 10.  Gender and glaucoma: what we know and what we need to know.

Authors:  Thasarat S Vajaranant; Sushma Nayak; Jacob T Wilensky; Charlotte E Joslin
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.761

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.