Literature DB >> 25721518

Comparison of visual field progression between temporally tilted disc and nontilted disc, in patients with normal tension glaucoma.

Y J Choy1, Y Kwun2, J C Han2, C Kee2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term visual field (VF) progression of temporally tilted disc and nontilted disc in normal tension glaucoma (NTG).
METHODS: Retrospective, observational case series. Forty-seven patients with temporally tilted disc (47 eyes), 44 patients with nontilted disc in NTG (44 eyes) patients, who were examined by at least 5 VF tests, and were followed-up over a 5-year period, at the Department of Ophthalmology of the Samsung Medical Center, from May 1998 to 2013. VF progression was defined by modified Anderson-Hodapp criteria, and Glaucoma Progression Analysis (GPA). Multivariate analysis was used to identify the risk factors for VF progression in the temporally tilted disc.
RESULTS: According to the Anderson-Hodapp criteria, progression rates of the temporally tilted disc and nontilted disc at 60 months were 19% and 72%, respectively (P<0.0001). According to GPA, they were 25% and 53%, respectively (P<0.0001). Twenty of 47 patients in the temporally tilted disc did not show progression. Among them, the more tilted disc showed the more VF defects. The hazard ratio of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defect type was 3.08 (95% CI, 1.17-8.14; P=0.02). The simultaneous superior and inferior RNFL defect type was the most common in progressors in the temporally tilted disc (P=0.04).
CONCLUSION: Through long-term follow-up, the cumulative survival rate of temporally tilted disc was higher than that of nontilted disc. Caution is required in the treatment of the temporally tilted disc. New treatment policy for the temporally tilted disc may follow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25721518      PMCID: PMC4815697          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2015.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  28 in total

1.  Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma.

Authors:  Harsha L Rao; Addepalli U Kumar; Jonnadula G Babu; Sirisha Senthil; Chandra S Garudadri
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Optic disc torsion direction predicts the location of glaucomatous damage in normal-tension glaucoma patients with myopia.

Authors:  Hae-Young L Park; Kook Lee; Chan Kee Park
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Comparison of the progression rates of the superior, inferior, and both hemifield defects in normal-tension glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Hyun-Kyung Cho; Changwon Kee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Contributing factors for progression of visual field loss in normal-tension glaucoma patients with medical treatment.

Authors:  Rei Sakata; Makoto Aihara; Hiroshi Murata; Chihiro Mayama; Atsuo Tomidokoro; Aiko Iwase; Makoto Araie
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Population prevalence of tilted and torted optic discs among an adult Chinese population in Singapore: the Tanjong Pagar Study.

Authors:  Alicia C S How; Gavin S W Tan; Yiong-Huak Chan; Tina T L Wong; Steve K Seah; Paul J Foster; Tin Aung
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07

6.  Characteristics of patients with a localized retinal nerve fiber layer defect and normal optic disc appearance.

Authors:  J Lee; J Kim; C Kee
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Tilted optic discs: The Beijing Eye Study.

Authors:  Q S You; L Xu; J B Jonas
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Agreement between event-based and trend-based glaucoma progression analyses.

Authors:  H L Rao; T Kumbar; A U Kumar; J G Babu; S Senthil; C S Garudadri
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 9.  Imaging of the lamina cribrosa in glaucoma: perspectives of pathogenesis and clinical applications.

Authors:  Tae-Woo Kim; Larry Kagemann; Michaël J A Girard; Nicholas G Strouthidis; Kyung Rim Sung; Christopher K Leung; Joel S Schuman; Gadi Wollstein
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.424

10.  The time course of blur adaptation in emmetropes and myopes.

Authors:  Kiren A Khan; Katherine Dawson; Aleksandra Mankowska; Matthew P Cufflin; Edward A H Mallen
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  3 in total

1.  Influence of intraocular pressure reduction on progression of normal-tension glaucoma with myopic tilted disc and associated risk factors.

Authors:  Bo Ram Seol; Soa Kim; Dong Myung Kim; Ki Ho Park; Jin Wook Jeoung; Seok Hwan Kim
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Posterior staphyloma is associated with the microvasculature and microstructure of myopic eyes.

Authors:  Fen Nie; Junyi Ouyang; Wenquan Tang; Lijia Luo; Mengdan Cao; Lurong Zhang; Dengming Zhou; Ke Liu; Daijin Ma; Xuanchu Duan
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Characteristics of progressive temporal visual field defects in patients with myopia.

Authors:  Jiyun Lee; Chan Kee Park; Kyoung In Jung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.