Literature DB >> 26315701

Are rates of vision loss in patients in English glaucoma clinics slowing down over time? Trends from a decade of data.

T Boodhna1, L J Saunders1, D P Crabb1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine changes in rates of visual field (VF) progression in patients attending a sample of glaucoma clinics in England between 1999 and 2012.
METHODS: An archive of 473 252 Humphrey VFs recorded across the UK was retrospectively examined. Distribution of rates recorded in the first half of the decade was compared with the second. The relationship between age and severity of MD loss at baseline with rates of loss and frequency of testing was examined.
RESULTS: VF series from 18 926 eyes were analysed. Median rate of MD loss for the period before and after 2003 was -0.11 and -0.06 dB/year, respectively, but the proportion of eyes with medium or fast rates of MD loss remained constant. Median rate of MD loss in older (>70 years) eyes was faster than that observed in younger (<60 years) eyes (-0.21 compared with -0.01 dB/year). Median rate of loss did not vary with severity of MD loss at baseline. Frequency of testing, typically carried out annually, did not vary by age, rate of loss or disease severity.
CONCLUSIONS: VFs of eyes treated in the first half of the decade deteriorated more rapidly than those in the second half. Several factors might explain these differences but average effects were small and there was no reduction in the proportion of rapidly progressing eyes over the decade. Older age and, to a lesser extent, worse VF damage at diagnosis are indicators for faster VF loss in clinics, but frequency of VF testing was similar for all patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26315701      PMCID: PMC5129813          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2015.161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  34 in total

1.  The effects of new topical treatments on management of glaucoma in Scotland: an examination of ophthalmological health care.

Authors:  D N Bateman; R Clark; A Azuara-Blanco; M Bain; J Forrest
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects.

Authors:  A Heijl; G Lindgren; J Olsson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-01

3.  Progression detection in glaucoma can be made more efficient by using a variable interval between successive visual field tests.

Authors:  Nomdo M Jansonius
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Incorporating life expectancy in glaucoma care.

Authors:  C Wesselink; R Stoutenbeek; N M Jansonius
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  The neovascular age-related macular degeneration database: multicenter study of 92 976 ranibizumab injections: report 1: visual acuity.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Practical landmarks for visual field disability in glaucoma.

Authors:  Luke J Saunders; Richard A Russell; David P Crabb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 7.  Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; D F Garway-Heath; F J Goñi; L Rossetti; B Bengtsson; A C Viswanathan; A Heijl
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  A qualitative investigation into patients' views on visual field testing for glaucoma monitoring.

Authors:  Fiona C Glen; Helen Baker; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  A survey of attitudes of glaucoma subspecialists in England and Wales to visual field test intervals in relation to NICE guidelines.

Authors:  Rizwan Malik; Helen Baker; Richard A Russell; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Examining visual field loss in patients in glaucoma clinics during their predicted remaining lifetime.

Authors:  Luke J Saunders; Richard A Russell; James F Kirwan; Andrew I McNaught; David P Crabb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Functional assessment of glaucoma: Uncovering progression.

Authors:  Rongrong Hu; Lyne Racette; Kelly S Chen; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  More frequent, more costly? Health economic modelling aspects of monitoring glaucoma patients in England.

Authors:  Trishal Boodhna; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  A New Graphical Tool for Assessing Visual Field Progression in Clinical Populations.

Authors:  Susan R Bryan; David P Crabb
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Does eye examination order for standard automated perimetry matter?

Authors:  Stephen R Kelly; Susan R Bryan; David P Crabb
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.761

5.  Remote Grading of the Anterior Chamber Angle Using Goniophotographs and Optical Coherence Tomography: Implications for Telemedicine or Virtual Clinics.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Henrietta Wang; Vincent Khou; Sophia Zhang; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Auditing service delivery in glaucoma clinics using visual field records: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Stephen R Kelly; Susan R Bryan; John M Sparrow; David P Crabb
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.