Literature DB >> 30209292

Epistasis regulates the developmental stability of the mouse craniofacial shape.

Ceferino Varón-González1, Nicolas Navarro2,3.   

Abstract

Fluctuating asymmetry is a classic concept linked to organismal development. It has traditionally been used as a measure of developmental instability, which is the inability of an organism to buffer environmental fluctuations during development. Developmental stability has a genetic component that influences the final phenotype of the organism and can lead to congenital disorders. According to alternative hypotheses, this genetic component might be either the result of additive genetic effects or a by-product of developmental gene networks. Here we present a genome-wide association study of the genetic architecture of fluctuating asymmetry of the skull shape in mice. Geometric morphometric methods were applied to quantify fluctuating asymmetry: we estimated fluctuating asymmetry as Mahalanobis distances to the mean asymmetry, correcting first for genetic directional asymmetry. We applied the marginal epistasis test to study epistasis among genomic regions. Results showed no evidence of additive effects but several interacting regions significantly associated with fluctuating asymmetry. Among the candidate genes overlapping these interacting regions we found an over-representation of genes involved in craniofacial development. A gene network is likely to be associated with skull developmental stability, and genes originally described as buffering genes (e.g., Hspa2) might occupy central positions within these networks, where regulatory elements may also play an important role. Our results constitute an important step in the exploration of the molecular roots of developmental stability and the first empirical evidence about its genetic architecture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30209292      PMCID: PMC6461946          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-018-0140-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  66 in total

1.  RNA sequence analysis defines Dicer's role in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  J Mauro Calabrese; Amy C Seila; Gene W Yeo; Phillip A Sharp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Epistasis and the release of genetic variation during long-term selection.

Authors:  Orjan Carlborg; Lina Jacobsson; Per Ahgren; Paul Siegel; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF DEVELOPMENT: GENETIC CORRELATIONS AMONG AGE-SPECIFIC TRAIT VALUES AND THE EVOLUTION OF ONTOGENY.

Authors:  James M Cheverud; J J Rutledge; William R Atchley
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  GENETIC COMPONENTS OF SIZE AND SHAPE. I. DYNAMICS OF COMPONENTS OF PHENOTYPIC VARIABILITY AND COVARIABILITY DURING ONTOGENY IN THE LABORATORY RAT.

Authors:  William R Atchley; J J Rutledge
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Robustness and epistasis in the C. elegans vulval signaling network revealed by pathway dosage modulation.

Authors:  Michalis Barkoulas; Jeroen S van Zon; Josselin Milloz; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 6.  Diversity and convergence in the mechanisms establishing L/R asymmetry in metazoa.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Coutelis; Nicanor González-Morales; Charles Géminard; Stéphane Noselli
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping.

Authors:  G A Churchill; R W Doerge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic analysis of skull shape variation and morphological integration in the mouse using interspecific recombinant congenic strains between C57BL/6 and mice of the mus spretus species.

Authors:  Gaëtan Burgio; Michel Baylac; Evelyne Heyer; Xavier Montagutelli
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  A single basis for developmental buffering of Drosophila wing shape.

Authors:  Casper J Breuker; James S Patterson; Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Fine tuning of craniofacial morphology by distant-acting enhancers.

Authors:  Catia Attanasio; Alex S Nord; Yiwen Zhu; Matthew J Blow; Zirong Li; Denise K Liberton; Harris Morrison; Ingrid Plajzer-Frick; Amy Holt; Roya Hosseini; Sengthavy Phouanenavong; Jennifer A Akiyama; Malak Shoukry; Veena Afzal; Edward M Rubin; David R FitzPatrick; Bing Ren; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Len A Pennacchio; Axel Visel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  Developmental instability and phenotypic evolution in a small and isolated bear population.

Authors:  A Loy; P Ciucci; G Guidarelli; E Roccotelli; P Colangelo
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Mouse Skull Mean Shape and Shape Robustness Rely on Different Genetic Architectures and Different Loci.

Authors:  Ceferino Varón-González; Luisa F Pallares; Vincent Debat; Nicolas Navarro
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 3.  Genetic Modifiers and Rare Mendelian Disease.

Authors:  K M Tahsin Hassan Rahit; Maja Tarailo-Graovac
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Modeling epistasis in mice and yeast using the proportion of two or more distinct genetic backgrounds: Evidence for "polygenic epistasis".

Authors:  Christoph D Rau; Natalia M Gonzales; Joshua S Bloom; Danny Park; Julien Ayroles; Abraham A Palmer; Aldons J Lusis; Noah Zaitlen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 6.020

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.