Literature DB >> 29985527

Directional selection reduces developmental canalization against genetic and environmental perturbations in Drosophila wings.

Benjamin R Groth1,2, Yuheng Huang1,2, Matthew J Monette1, John E Pool1.   

Abstract

Natural selection may enhance or weaken the robustness of phenotypes against genetic or environmental perturbations. However, important aspects of the relationship between adaptive evolution and canalization remain unclear. Recent work showed that the evolution of larger wing size in a high altitude natural population of Drosophila melanogaster was accompanied by decanalized wing development--specifically a loss of robustness to genetic perturbation. But this study did not address environmental robustness, and it compared populations that may have numerous biological differences. Here, we perform artificial selection on this same trait in D. melanogaster (larger wing length) and directly test whether this directional selection resulted in decanalization. We find that in general, size-selected replicates show greater frequencies of wing defects than control replicates both after mutagenesis (genetic perturbation) and when subjected to high temperature stress (environmental perturbation), although the increase in defect frequency varies importantly among replicates. These results support the hypothesis that directional selection may result in the loss of both genetic and environmental robustness-offering a rare window into the relationship between adaptation and canalization.
© 2018 The Author(s). Evolution © 2018 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial selection; canalization; heat stress; mutagenesis; wing defect

Year:  2018        PMID: 29985527      PMCID: PMC7003245          DOI: 10.1111/evo.13550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  33 in total

1.  A comparison of the genetic basis of wing size divergence in three parallel body size clines of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A S Gilchrist; L Partridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The contrasting genetic architecture of wing size and shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A S Gilchrist; L Partridge
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 3.  The evolutionary genetics of canalization.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.875

4.  Plasticity, canalization, and developmental stability of the Drosophila wing: joint effects of mutations and developmental temperature.

Authors:  Vincent Debat; Allan Debelle; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Mutation predicts 40 million years of fly wing evolution.

Authors:  David Houle; Geir H Bolstad; Kim van der Linde; Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A QUANTITATIVE-GENETIC MODEL FOR SELECTION ON DEVELOPMENTAL NOISE.

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets; Alan Hastings
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Identification of genes affecting wing patterning through a loss-of-function mutagenesis screen and characterization of med15 function during wing development.

Authors:  Ana Terriente-Félix; Ana López-Varea; Jose F de Celis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Wing vein formation in Drosophila melanogaster: hairless is involved in the cross-talk between Notch and EGF signaling pathways.

Authors:  Bernd Johannes; Anette Preiss
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.882

9.  Allometric and nonallometric components of Drosophila wing shape respond differently to developmental temperature.

Authors:  Vincent Debat; Mattieu Bégin; Hélène Legout; Jean R David
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Automated measurement of Drosophila wings.

Authors:  David Houle; Jason Mezey; Paul Galpern; Ashley Carter
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  1 in total

1.  Gene Regulatory Evolution in Cold-Adapted Fly Populations Neutralizes Plasticity and May Undermine Genetic Canalization.

Authors:  Yuheng Huang; Justin B Lack; Grant T Hoppel; John E Pool
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 4.065

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.