Literature DB >> 11380381

Women's preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors.

J A Gamble1, D K Creedy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined women's preferences for birth. The object of this study was to determine the incidence of women's preferred type of birth, and the reasons and factors associated with their preference.
METHODS: Three hundred and ten women between 36 and 40 weeks' gestation were recruited from the antenatal clinic of a major metropolitan teaching hospital and the consulting rooms of six private obstetricians in Brisbane, Australia. Participants completed a questionnaire asking about their preferred type of birth, reasons for their preference, preparation for childbirth, level of anxiety and concerns, and the influence of the primary caregiver.
RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety women (93.5%) preferred a spontaneous vaginal birth; 20 women (6.4%) preferred a cesarean section. Of the latter group, most had a current obstetric complication or experienced a previously complicated delivery (p <0.001); 1 woman (0.3%) preferred a cesarean section in the absence of any known current or previous obstetric complication. Women who preferred a cesarean section were more anxious, were generally poorly informed of the risks of this procedure, and/or overestimated the safety of the procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Women who preferred a cesarean section were more likely to have experienced this type of birth previously and to have negative feelings about it. To decrease women's preference for a cesarean section, practitioners should reduce the primary cesarean delivery rate and improve the quality of emotional care for women who require a cesarean section. Caregivers should engage in a sensitive discussion of the risks and benefits of various birth options, including a vaginal birth after cesarean, with women who have previously experienced a cesarean birth before they make decisions about mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11380381     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2001.00101.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  31 in total

1.  Awareness and Perceptions of and Attitudes towards Caesarean Delivery among Antenatal.

Authors:  Rk Adageba; Ka Danso; A Adusu-Donkor; F Ankobea-Kokroe
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2008-12

2.  Experience of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Phenomenological Study.

Authors:  Silvio Simeone; Filomena Stile; Guillari Assunta; Gianpaolo Gargiulo; Teresa Rea
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2019-07-01

3.  Secular changes in body height predict global rates of caesarean section.

Authors:  Eva Zaffarini; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Delivery route preferences of urban women of low socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Bela Kudish; Shobha Mehta; Michael Kruger; Evie Russell; Robert J Sokol
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Non-pregnant patients' preference for delivery route.

Authors:  Andrea R Thurman; James S Zoller; Steven E Swift
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-05-14

6.  Cesarean delivery on maternal request: a western North Carolina perspective.

Authors:  Stephanie T Romero; Carol C Coulson; Shelley L Galvin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-04

7.  Women's preference for cesarean delivery and differences between Taiwanese women undergoing different modes of delivery.

Authors:  Kuei-Hui Chu; Chen-Jei Tai; Chun-Sen Hsu; Mei-Chiang Yeh; Li-Yin Chien
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Preference of ghanaian women for vaginal or caesarean delivery postpartum.

Authors:  Ka Danso; Hm Schwandt; Ca Turpin; Jd Seffah; A Samba; Mj Hindin
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2009-03

9.  Differences in the Frequency of Use of Epidural Analgesia between Immigrant Women of Turkish Origin and Non-Immigrant Women in Germany - Explanatory Approaches and Conclusions of a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  I Petruschke; B Ramsauer; T Borde; M David
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 10.  Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Ioannis Mylonas; Klaus Friese
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.