Literature DB >> 11375194

Comparison of endotoxin exposure assessment by bioaerosol impinger and filter-sampling methods.

C Duchaine1, P S Thorne, A Mériaux, Y Grimard, P Whitten, Y Cormier.   

Abstract

Environmental assessment data collected in two prior occupational hygiene studies of swine barns and sawmills allowed the comparison of concurrent, triplicate, side-by-side endotoxin measurements using air sampling filters and bioaerosol impingers. Endotoxin concentrations in impinger solutions and filter eluates were assayed using the Limulus amebocyte lysate assay. In sawmills, impinger sampling yielded significantly higher endotoxin concentration measurements and lower variances than filter sampling with IOM inhalable dust samplers. Analysis of variance for repeated measures showed that this association remained after controlling for other factors such as replicate, sawmill, sawmill operation, wood type, and interaction terms. Endotoxin concentrations in the swine barns were 10-fold higher on average than in sawmills. These samples demonstrated comparable endotoxin concentration estimates for impinger and filter methods although the variability was lower using the impinger method. In both occupational settings, side-by-side replicates were more uniform for the impinger samples than for the filter samples. This study demonstrates that impinger sampling is an acceptable method for quantitation of area endotoxin concentrations. Further, when sampling is performed with impingers for airborne microorganism quantitation, these same impinger solutions can yield valid endotoxin exposure estimates, negating the need for additional filter sampling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11375194      PMCID: PMC92938          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2775-2780.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  23 in total

1.  Influence of building maintenance, environmental factors, and seasons on airborne contaminants of swine confinement buildings.

Authors:  C Duchaine; Y Grimard; Y Cormier
Journal:  AIHAJ       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

2.  Comparison of bioaerosol sampling methods in barns housing swine.

Authors:  P S Thorne; M S Kiekhaefer; P Whitten; K J Donham
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of methods for detection and enumeration of airborne microorganisms collected by liquid impingement.

Authors:  S Terzieva; J Donnelly; V Ulevicius; S A Grinshpun; K Willeke; G N Stelma; K P Brenner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effects of different extraction protocols on endotoxin analyses of airborne grain dusts.

Authors:  S A Olenchock; D M Lewis; J C Mull
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.024

5.  Endotoxin responsiveness and subchronic grain dust-induced airway disease.

Authors:  C L George; H Jin; C L Wohlford-Lenane; M E O'Neill; J C Phipps; P O'Shaughnessy; J N Kline; P S Thorne; D A Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.464

6.  Cotton dust and endotoxin exposure-response relationships in cotton textile workers.

Authors:  S M Kennedy; D C Christiani; E A Eisen; D H Wegman; I A Greaves; S A Olenchock; T T Ye; P L Lu
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1987-01

7.  Inhibition and enhancement in the analysis of airborne endotoxin levels in various occupational environments.

Authors:  A Hollander; D Heederik; P Versloot; J Douwes
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1993-11

8.  Determinants of dust and endotoxin exposure of pig farmers: development of a control strategy using empirical modelling.

Authors:  L Preller; D Heederik; H Kromhout; J S Boleij; M J Tielen
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1995-10

9.  Influence of various dust sampling and extraction methods on the measurement of airborne endotoxin.

Authors:  J Douwes; P Versloot; A Hollander; D Heederik; G Doekes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Application of flow cytometry and fluorescent in situ hybridization for assessment of exposures to airborne bacteria.

Authors:  J L Lange; P S Thorne; N Lynch
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  7 in total

1.  Optimization of airborne endotoxin exposure assessment: effects of filter type, transport conditions, extraction solutions, and storage of samples and extracts.

Authors:  Suzanne Spaan; Dick J J Heederik; Peter S Thorne; Inge M Wouters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Field Studies Measuring the Aerosolization of Endotoxin During the Land Application of Class B Biosolids.

Authors:  R F Herrmann; R J Grosser; D Farrar; R B Brobst
Journal:  Aerobiologia (Bologna)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.410

3.  Concentrations of bioaerosols, odors, and hydrogen sulfide inside and downwind from two types of swine livestock operations.

Authors:  Peter S Thorne; Anne C Ansley; Sarah Spencer Perry
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  The Use of Bioaerosol Sampling for Airborne Virus Surveillance in Swine Production Facilities: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Benjamin D Anderson; John A Lednicky; Montserrat Torremorell; Gregory C Gray
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-07-27

5.  Coordinated Sampling of Microorganisms Over Freshwater and Saltwater Environments Using an Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV) and a Small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS).

Authors:  Craig W Powers; Regina Hanlon; Hinrich Grothe; Aaron J Prussin; Linsey C Marr; David G Schmale
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Protocol Improvements for Low Concentration DNA-Based Bioaerosol Sampling and Analysis.

Authors:  Irvan Luhung; Yan Wu; Chun Kiat Ng; Dana Miller; Bin Cao; Victor Wei-Chung Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An Investigation of Airborne Bioaerosols and Endotoxins Present in Indoor Traditional Wet Markets before and after Operation in Taiwan: A Case Study.

Authors:  Da-Jiun Wei; Wen-Te Liu; Huin-Tsung Chin; Ching-Hsing Lin; I-Chun Chen; Yi-Tang Chang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.