Literature DB >> 19177273

Concentrations of bioaerosols, odors, and hydrogen sulfide inside and downwind from two types of swine livestock operations.

Peter S Thorne1, Anne C Ansley, Sarah Spencer Perry.   

Abstract

Few data on in-barn and downwind concentrations of endotoxin, bioaerosols, and odors from livestock facilities are available, and no studies have compared conventional confinement operations with the more animal-friendly hoop operations. Hoops are open to the environment and use a composted bedding system rather than housing pigs on slatted floors over pits holding manure slurry as in conventional confinements. We assessed airborne toxicants upwind, in barns, and downwind and evaluated determinants of exposure. Inhalable particulate matter, endotoxin, odor threshold, hydrogen sulfide, culturable mesophilic bacteria, culturable fungi, and total airborne microbes, along with wind speed, temperature, and humidity were measured at separate midsized livestock facilities (one hoop, one confinement) in Central Iowa on 10 occasions over 2 years. Significant differences in contaminants were observed between hoops and confinement buildings and across seasons for endotoxin, odors, airborne microorganisms, and hydrogen sulfide. For hoops and confinements, respectively, geometric mean in-barn concentrations were 3250 and 3100 EU/m(3) for endotoxin; 1400 and 1910 microg/m(3) for particulates; 19.6 and 146 ppb for hydrogen sulfide; 137 and 428 dilutions for odor threshold; and 3.0 x 10(6) and 1.5 x 10(6) organisms/m(3) for total microbes. Endotoxin, odor, and culturable microorganisms exceeded recommended exposure limits. Reduced analysis of variance models for these contaminants demonstrated differences by barn type, season, number of pigs, and, in some cases, temperature and humidity. Both types of swine operations produced high airborne concentrations of endotoxin, odor, hydrogen sulfide, bacteria, and fungi. Endotoxin and odors were found downwind at concentrations previously associated with adverse health effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19177273      PMCID: PMC4844821          DOI: 10.1080/15459620902729184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  27 in total

1.  Comparison of endotoxin exposure assessment by bioaerosol impinger and filter-sampling methods.

Authors:  C Duchaine; P S Thorne; A Mériaux; Y Grimard; P Whitten; Y Cormier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparison of bioaerosol sampling methods in barns housing swine.

Authors:  P S Thorne; M S Kiekhaefer; P Whitten; K J Donham
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Airborne dust, ammonia, microorganisms, and antigens in pig confinement houses and the respiratory health of exposed farm workers.

Authors:  B Crook; J F Robertson; S A Glass; E M Botheroyd; J Lacey; M D Topping
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1991-07

4.  Endotoxin exposure as a major determinant of lung function decline in pig farmers.

Authors:  P F Vogelzang; J W van der Gulden; H Folgering; J J Kolk; D Heederik; L Preller; M J Tielen; C P van Schayck
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  A study of the relationship between airborne contaminants and environmental factors in Dutch swine confinement buildings.

Authors:  P Attwood; R Brouwer; P Ruigewaard; P Versloot; R de Wit; D Heederik; J S Boleij
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1987-08

6.  Ambient endotoxin level in an area with intensive livestock production.

Authors:  Anja Schulze; Rob van Strien; Vera Ehrenstein; Rudolf Schierl; Helmut Küchenhoff; Katja Radon
Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.447

7.  Respiratory health of swine producers. Focus on young workers.

Authors:  J E Zejda; T S Hurst; C S Rhodes; E M Barber; H H McDuffie; J A Dosman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Respiratory dysfunction in swine production facility workers: dose-response relationships of environmental exposures and pulmonary function.

Authors:  K J Donham; S J Reynolds; P Whitten; J A Merchant; L Burmeister; W J Popendorf
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  Health effects of airborne exposures from concentrated animal feeding operations.

Authors:  Dick Heederik; Torben Sigsgaard; Peter S Thorne; Joel N Kline; Rachel Avery; Jakob H Bønløkke; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; James A Dosman; Caroline Duchaine; Steven R Kirkhorn; Katarina Kulhankova; James A Merchant
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among eastern North Carolina residents.

Authors:  S Wing; S Wolf
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  21 in total

1.  Ambient Ammonia Exposures in an Agricultural Community and Pediatric Asthma Morbidity.

Authors:  Christine Loftus; Michael Yost; Paul Sampson; Elizabeth Torres; Griselda Arias; Victoria Breckwich Vasquez; Kris Hartin; Jenna Armstrong; Maria Tchong-French; Sverre Vedal; Parveen Bhatti; Catherine Karr
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Field and wind tunnel comparison of four aerosol samplers using agricultural dusts.

Authors:  Stephen J Reynolds; Jason Nakatsu; Marvin Tillery; Thomas Keefe; John Mehaffy; Peter S Thorne; Kelley Donham; Matthew Nonnenmann; Vijay Golla; Patrick O'shaughnessy
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-05-14

Review 3.  A comprehensive review of levels and determinants of personal exposure to dust and endotoxin in livestock farming.

Authors:  Ioannis Basinas; Torben Sigsgaard; Hans Kromhout; Dick Heederik; Inge M Wouters; Vivi Schlünssen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Farm animal models of organic dust exposure and toxicity: insights and implications for respiratory health.

Authors:  Chakia J McClendon; Carresse L Gerald; Jenora T Waterman
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-04

5.  Household endotoxin reduction in the Louisa Environmental Intervention Project for rural childhood asthma.

Authors:  Angelico Mendy; Nervana Metwali; Sarah S Perry; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Kai Wang; Peter S Thorne
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.770

6.  Air pollution, lung function, and physical symptoms in communities near concentrated Swine feeding operations.

Authors:  Leah Schinasi; Rachel Avery Horton; Virginia T Guidry; Steve Wing; Stephen W Marshall; Kimberly B Morland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Indoor and outdoor particulate matter and endotoxin concentrations in an intensely agricultural county.

Authors:  Brian T Pavilonis; T Renee Anthony; Patrick T O'Shaughnessy; Michael J Humann; James A Merchant; Genna Moore; Peter S Thorne; Clifford P Weisel; Wayne T Sanderson
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  Estimated time-varying exposures to air emissions from animal feeding operations and childhood asthma.

Authors:  Christine Loftus; Zahra Afsharinejad; Paul Sampson; Sverre Vedal; Elizabeth Torres; Griselda Arias; Maria Tchong-French; Catherine Karr
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 5.840

9.  Passive monitors to measure hydrogen sulfide near concentrated animal feeding operations.

Authors:  Brian T Pavilonis; Patrick T O'Shaughnessy; Ralph Altmaier; Nervana Metwali; Peter S Thorne
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.238

10.  Urban Enhancement of PM10 Bioaerosol Tracers Relative to Background Locations in the Midwestern United States.

Authors:  Chathurika M Rathnayake; Nervana Metwali; Zach Baker; Thilina Jayarathne; Pamela A Kostle; Peter S Thorne; Patrick T O'Shaughnessy; Elizabeth A Stone
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.