Literature DB >> 9097451

Application of flow cytometry and fluorescent in situ hybridization for assessment of exposures to airborne bacteria.

J L Lange1, P S Thorne, N Lynch.   

Abstract

Current limitations in the methodology for enumeration and identification of airborne bacteria compromise the precision and accuracy of bioaerosol exposure assessment. In this study, flow cytometry and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) were evaluated for the assessment of exposures to airborne bacteria. Laboratory-generated two-component bioaerosols in exposures chambers and complex native bioaerosols in swine barns were sampled with two types of liquid impingers (all-glass impinger-30 and May 3-stage impinger). Aliquots of collection media were processed and enumerated by a standard culture technique, microscopy, or flow cytometry after nucleic acid staining with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and identified taxonomically by FISH. DAPI-labeled impinger samples yielded comparable estimates of bioaerosol concentrations when enumerated by microscopy or flow cytometry. The standard culture method underestimated bioaerosol concentrations by 2 orders of magnitude when compared to microscopy or flow cytometry. In the FISH method, aliquots of collection media were incubated with a probe universally complementary to eubacteria, a probe specific for several Pseudomonas species, and a probe complementary to eubacteria for detection of nonspecific binding. With these probes, FISH allowed quantitative identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli bioaerosols in the exposure chamber without measurable nonspecific binding. Impinger samples from the swine barn demonstrated the efficacy of the FISH method for the identification of eubacteria in a complex organic dust. This work demonstrates the potential of emerging molecular techniques to complement traditional methods of bioaerosol exposure assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9097451      PMCID: PMC168448          DOI: 10.1128/aem.63.4.1557-1563.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  21 in total

1.  The efficiency of various liquid impinger samplers in bacterial aerosols.

Authors:  K R MAY; G J HARPER
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1957-10

2.  Comparison of flow cytometry and epifluorescence microscopy for counting bacteria in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  P Monfort; B Baleux
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1992

3.  Practical aspects of sampling for organic dusts and microorganisms.

Authors:  P R Morey
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations.

Authors:  R I Amann; B J Binder; R J Olson; S W Chisholm; R Devereux; D A Stahl
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  A two-year study of microbiological indoor air quality in a new apartment.

Authors:  J M Macher; F Y Huang; M Flores
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb

6.  Characterizing aquatic bacteria according to population, cell size, and apparent DNA content by flow cytometry.

Authors:  B R Robertson; D K Button
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1989-01

7.  Phylogenetic stains: ribosomal RNA-based probes for the identification of single cells.

Authors:  E F DeLong; G S Wickham; N R Pace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Collection of airborne micro-organisms on Nuclepore filters, estimation and analysis--CAMNEA method.

Authors:  U Palmgren; G Ström; G Blomquist; P Malmberg
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1986-11

Review 9.  Hazardous agents in agricultural dusts and methods of evaluation.

Authors:  K J Donham
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Quantitation of cell concentration using the flow cytometer.

Authors:  C C Stewart; J A Steinkamp
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1982-01
View more
  10 in total

1.  Comparison of endotoxin exposure assessment by bioaerosol impinger and filter-sampling methods.

Authors:  C Duchaine; P S Thorne; A Mériaux; Y Grimard; P Whitten; Y Cormier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Development and use of flow cytometry for detection of airborne fungi.

Authors:  Valeria Prigione; Guido Lingua; Valeria Filipello Marchisio
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Spatial variability in airborne bacterial communities across land-use types and their relationship to the bacterial communities of potential source environments.

Authors:  Robert M Bowers; Shawna McLetchie; Rob Knight; Noah Fierer
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Characterization of airborne microbial communities at a high-elevation site and their potential to act as atmospheric ice nuclei.

Authors:  Robert M Bowers; Christian L Lauber; Christine Wiedinmyer; Micah Hamady; Anna G Hallar; Ray Fall; Rob Knight; Noah Fierer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Sources of bacteria in outdoor air across cities in the midwestern United States.

Authors:  Robert M Bowers; Amy P Sullivan; Elizabeth K Costello; Jeff L Collett; Rob Knight; Noah Fierer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  The Use of Bioaerosol Sampling for Airborne Virus Surveillance in Swine Production Facilities: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Benjamin D Anderson; John A Lednicky; Montserrat Torremorell; Gregory C Gray
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-07-27

Review 7.  Review of bioaerosols in indoor environment with special reference to sampling, analysis and control mechanisms.

Authors:  Bipasha Ghosh; Himanshu Lal; Arun Srivastava
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  Incorporating polymerase chain reaction-based identification, population characterization, and quantification of microorganisms into aerosol science: A review.

Authors:  Jordan Peccia; Mark Hernandez
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Flow cytometry, a powerful novel tool to rapidly assess bacterial viability in metal working fluids: Proof-of-principle.

Authors:  Donna Vanhauteghem; Kris Audenaert; Kristel Demeyere; Fred Hoogendoorn; Geert P J Janssens; Evelyne Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Potential of Flow Cytometric Approaches for Rapid Microbial Detection and Characterization in the Food Industry-A Review.

Authors:  Elena Zand; Antje Froehling; Christoph Schoenher; Marija Zunabovic-Pichler; Oliver Schlueter; Henry Jaeger
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.