Literature DB >> 11359484

Lateral ridge augmentation using different bone fillers and barrier membrane application. A histologic and histomorphometric pilot study in the canine mandible.

T von Arx1, D L Cochran, J S Hermann, R K Schenk, D Buser.   

Abstract

Lateral ridge augmentation has become a standard treatment option to enhance the bone volume of deficient recipient sites prior to implant placement. In order to avoid harvesting an autograft and thereby eliminating additional surgical procedures and risks, bone grafting materials and substitutes are alternative filler materials to be used for ridge augmentation. Before clinical recommendations can be made, such materials must be extensively studied in experimental models simulating relevant clinical situations. The present pilot study was conducted in three dogs. Different grafting procedures were evaluated for augmentation of lateral, extended (8 x 10 x 14 mm) and chronic bone defects in the mandibular alveolar ridge. Experimental sites received tricalcium phosphate (TCP) granules or demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) particles. Barrier membranes (ePTFE) were placed for graft protection. These approaches were compared to ridge augmentation using autogenous cortico-cancellous block grafts, either with or without ePTFE-membrane application. After a healing period of six months, the sites were analyzed histologically and histomorphometrically. Autografted sites with membrane protection showed excellent healing results with a well-preserved ridge profile, whereas non-protected block grafts underwent bucco-crestal resorption, clearly limiting the treatment outcome. The tested alloplastic (TCP) and allogenic (DFDBA) filler materials presented inconsistent findings with sometimes encapsulation of particles in connective tissue, thereby reducing the crestal bone width. The present pilot study supports the use of autografts with barrier membranes for lateral ridge augmentation of extended alveolar bone defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11359484     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003260.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  16 in total

1.  Poly(Thioketal Urethane) Autograft Extenders in an Intertransverse Process Model of Bone Formation.

Authors:  Madison A P McGough; Stefanie M Shiels; Lauren A Boller; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Craig L Duvall; Joseph C Wenke; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Contour changes after guided bone regeneration of large non-contained mandibular buccal bone defects using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a porcine-derived collagen membrane: an experimental in vivo investigation.

Authors:  I Sanz-Martin; L Ferrantino; F Vignoletti; J Nuñez; N Baldini; M Duvina; J Alcaraz; M Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Efficacy of autogenous teeth for the reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ausra Ramanauskaite; D Sahin; R Sader; J Becker; F Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effects of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Dose and Ceramic Composition on New Bone Formation and Space Maintenance in a Canine Mandibular Ridge Saddle Defect Model.

Authors:  Anne D Talley; Kerem N Kalpakci; Daniel A Shimko; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; David L Cochran; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  In Vitro and In Vivo Study of a Novel Porcine Collagen Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Eisner Salamanca; Chi-Yang Tsai; Yu-Hwa Pan; Yu-Te Lin; Haw-Ming Huang; Nai-Chia Teng; Che-Tong Lin; Sheng-Wei Feng; Wei-Jen Chang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Reconstruction of mandibular defects with autogenous bone and decellularized bovine bone grafts with freeze-dried bone marrow stem cell paracrine factors.

Authors:  Ann Kakabadze; Konstantine Mardaleishvili; George Loladze; Lia Karalashvili; Gocha Chutkerashvili; David Chakhunashvili; Zurab Kakabadze
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Effects of 3D-Printed Polycaprolactone/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Membranes on Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Jin-Hyung Shim; Joo-Yun Won; Jung-Hyung Park; Ji-Hyeon Bae; Geunseon Ahn; Chang-Hwan Kim; Dong-Hyuk Lim; Dong-Woo Cho; Won-Soo Yun; Eun-Bin Bae; Chang-Mo Jeong; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Effect of low-level laser therapy on incorporation of block allografts.

Authors:  Renato Valiati; Jefferson Viapiana Paes; Aury Nunes de Moraes; Aldo Gava; Michelle Agostini; Anelise Viapiana Masiero; Marilia Gerhardt de Oliveira; Rogério Miranda Pagnoncelli
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Application of calcium phosphate materials in dentistry.

Authors:  Jabr S Al-Sanabani; Ahmed A Madfa; Fadhel A Al-Sanabani
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2013-06-26

10.  Pre-augmentation soft tissue expansion improves scaffold-based vertical bone regeneration - a randomized study in dogs.

Authors:  Doğan Kaner; Han Zhao; Wolfgang Arnold; Hendrik Terheyden; Anton Friedmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.977

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.