Ausra Ramanauskaite1,2, D Sahin3, R Sader4, J Becker3, F Schwarz5. 1. Department of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Carolinum, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. ramanauskaite@med.uni-frankfurt.de. 2. Department of Oral Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. ramanauskaite@med.uni-frankfurt.de. 3. Department of Oral Surgery, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 4. Department for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 5. Department of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Carolinum, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the currently existing clinical evidence on the efficacy of autogenous teeth (AT) for the reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search protocol was developed to answer the focused question: "In patients exhibiting alveolar ridge deficiencies and being in need of an implant retained restoration, what is the efficacy of reconstructive procedures employing AT on changes in ridge dimensions compared with control measures?" Uncontrolled studies were also included to assess the overall efficacy of AT for specific procedures. RESULTS: A total of six studies (one randomized, one non-randomized controlled, two observational, one controlled case series, one retrospective) were identified. Two studies used AT for staged lateral augmentation, whereas four studies used AT as a demineralized dentin matrix (AutoBT) for the simultaneous grafting of dehiscence-type defects, vertical augmentation of post-extraction sockets, and lateral/transcrestal sinus floor elevation. The reported clinical outcomes following the application of either AT or AutoBT were within the range of those data noted in the respective control groups. Adverse events were commonly not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The available limited studies involved relatively small patient samples and short follow-up periods but pointed to the potential of AT to serve as an alternative material for the reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: AT appear to be effective in reconstructing alveolar ridge deficiencies.
AIM: The aim of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the currently existing clinical evidence on the efficacy of autogenous teeth (AT) for the reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search protocol was developed to answer the focused question: "In patients exhibiting alveolar ridge deficiencies and being in need of an implant retained restoration, what is the efficacy of reconstructive procedures employing AT on changes in ridge dimensions compared with control measures?" Uncontrolled studies were also included to assess the overall efficacy of AT for specific procedures. RESULTS: A total of six studies (one randomized, one non-randomized controlled, two observational, one controlled case series, one retrospective) were identified. Two studies used AT for staged lateral augmentation, whereas four studies used AT as a demineralized dentin matrix (AutoBT) for the simultaneous grafting of dehiscence-type defects, vertical augmentation of post-extraction sockets, and lateral/transcrestal sinus floor elevation. The reported clinical outcomes following the application of either AT or AutoBT were within the range of those data noted in the respective control groups. Adverse events were commonly not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The available limited studies involved relatively small patient samples and short follow-up periods but pointed to the potential of AT to serve as an alternative material for the reconstruction of alveolar ridge deficiencies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: AT appear to be effective in reconstructing alveolar ridge deficiencies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Autogenous tooth; Bone augmentation; Regeneration; Systematic review
Authors: Maria Peñarrocha-Diago; Amparo Aloy-Prósper; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Jose Luis Calvo-Guirado; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Omer Sefvan Janjua; Sana Mehmood Qureshi; Muhammad Saad Shaikh; Ahmad Alnazzawi; Francisco J Rodriguez-Lozano; Maria Pilar Pecci-Lloret; Muhammad Sohail Zafar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-20 Impact factor: 3.390