I Sanz-Martin1,2, L Ferrantino3, F Vignoletti4, J Nuñez4, N Baldini5, M Duvina6, J Alcaraz4, M Sanz4. 1. Section of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. ignaciosanzmartin@odon.ucm.es. 2. Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal, 28040, Madrid, Spain. ignaciosanzmartin@odon.ucm.es. 3. Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università di Milano, Milan, Italy. 4. Section of Periodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 5. Department of Periodontics and Fixed Prosthodontics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. 6. Oral Surgery Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate soft tissue contour changes after three different regenerative therapies in chronic ridge defects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Buccal bone defects were created in the mandible of nine beagle dogs. Augmentation procedures were performed 3 months later using a bone replacement graft (BRG), resorbable collagen membrane (MBG), or a combination of both procedures (CBG). Silicone impressions were taken before tooth extraction (T1), before the augmentation procedure (T2), and 3 months after the regenerative surgeries (T3). Casts were optically scanned and stereolithography files were superimposed to analyze the horizontal changes in ridge contours. RESULTS: After defect creation, most part of the horizontal changes occurred 4 and 6 mm below the gingival margin. In the mesial defect (D1) at T3, the mean horizontal gain in MBG amounted to 0.47 ± 0.34 mm, 0.79 ± 0.67 mm in the BRG, and 0.87 ± 0.69 mm for the CBG. In the middle defect (D2), the mean changes for the MBG were 0.11 ± 0.31, 1.01 ± 0.91 for the BRG, and 0.98 ± 0.49 for the CBG. The mean changes in the distal defect (D3) amounted to 0.24 ± 0.72 for the MBG, 1.04 ± 0.92 for the BRG, and 0.86 ± 0.56 for the CBG. The differences reached significance in all defects for the comparison MBG-BRG and MBG-CBG, while similar parameters were observed for the comparison BRG-CBG. CONCLUSION: BRG and CBG were equally effective and superior to MBG in increasing the horizontal tissue contours. The augmentation seldom reached the values before extraction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Scaffolding materials are needed for contour augmentation when using resorbable collagen membranes.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate soft tissue contour changes after three different regenerative therapies in chronic ridge defects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Buccal bone defects were created in the mandible of nine beagle dogs. Augmentation procedures were performed 3 months later using a bone replacement graft (BRG), resorbable collagen membrane (MBG), or a combination of both procedures (CBG). Silicone impressions were taken before tooth extraction (T1), before the augmentation procedure (T2), and 3 months after the regenerative surgeries (T3). Casts were optically scanned and stereolithography files were superimposed to analyze the horizontal changes in ridge contours. RESULTS: After defect creation, most part of the horizontal changes occurred 4 and 6 mm below the gingival margin. In the mesial defect (D1) at T3, the mean horizontal gain in MBG amounted to 0.47 ± 0.34 mm, 0.79 ± 0.67 mm in the BRG, and 0.87 ± 0.69 mm for the CBG. In the middle defect (D2), the mean changes for the MBG were 0.11 ± 0.31, 1.01 ± 0.91 for the BRG, and 0.98 ± 0.49 for the CBG. The mean changes in the distal defect (D3) amounted to 0.24 ± 0.72 for the MBG, 1.04 ± 0.92 for the BRG, and 0.86 ± 0.56 for the CBG. The differences reached significance in all defects for the comparison MBG-BRG and MBG-CBG, while similar parameters were observed for the comparison BRG-CBG. CONCLUSION: BRG and CBG were equally effective and superior to MBG in increasing the horizontal tissue contours. The augmentation seldom reached the values before extraction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Scaffolding materials are needed for contour augmentation when using resorbable collagen membranes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone regeneration; Bovine bone mineral; Collagen membrane; Experimental study; Wound healing
Authors: Daniel S Thoma; Ronald E Jung; David Schneider; David L Cochran; Andreas Ender; Archie A Jones; Christoph Görlach; Lorenz Uebersax; Ursula Graf-Hausner; Christoph H F Hämmerle Journal: J Clin Periodontol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 8.728
Authors: Ignacio Sanz-Martín; Irena Sailer; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Daniel S Thoma Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Date: 2016-01-16 Impact factor: 5.977
Authors: Antonio Barone; Marzio Todisco; Maurizio Ludovichetti; Federico Gualini; Hans Aggstaller; Daniel Torrés-Lagares; Michael D Rohrer; Hari S Prasad; James N Kenealy Journal: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Ralf Smeets; Levi Matthies; Peter Windisch; Martin Gosau; Ronald Jung; Nadine Brodala; Martina Stefanini; Johannes Kleinheinz; Michael Payer; Anders Henningsen; Bilal Al-Nawas; Christian Knipfer Journal: Int J Implant Dent Date: 2022-05-09