Literature DB >> 24658632

Visual control of trunk translation and orientation during locomotion.

E Anson, P Agada, T Kiemel, Y Ivanenko, F Lacquaniti, J Jeka.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested distinct control of gait characteristics in the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) directions in response to visual input. Responses were larger to a ML visual stimulus, suggesting that vision plays a larger role in stabilizing gait in the ML direction. Here, we investigated responses of the trunk during locomotion to determine whether a similar direction dependence is observed. We hypothesized that translation of the trunk would show a similar ML dependence on vision, but that angular deviations of the trunk would show equivalent responses in all directions. Subjects stood or walked on a treadmill at 5 km/h while viewing a virtual wall of white triangles that moved in either the AP or ML direction according to a broadband input stimulus. Frequency response functions between the visual scene motion and trunk kinematics revealed that trunk translation gain was larger across all frequencies during walking compared with standing. Trunk orientation responses were not different from standing at very low frequencies; however, at high frequencies, trunk orientation gain was much higher during walking. Larger gains in response to ML visual scene motion were found for all trunk movements. Higher gains in the ML direction while walking suggest that visual feedback may contribute more to the stability of trunk movements in the ML direction. Vision modified trunk movement behavior on both a slow (translation) and fast (orientation) time scale suggesting a priority for minimizing angular deviations of the trunk. Overall, trunk responses to visual input were consistent with the theme that control of locomotion requires higher-level sensory input to maintain stability in the ML direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24658632      PMCID: PMC4087056          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3885-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Interaction between different sensory cues in the control of human gait.

Authors:  Elodie Varraine; Mireille Bonnard; Jean Pailhous
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The many roles of vision during walking.

Authors:  David Logan; Tim Kiemel; Nadia Dominici; Germana Cappellini; Yuri Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti; John J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Walking variability during continuous pseudo-random oscillations of the support surface and visual field.

Authors:  Patricia M McAndrew; Jonathan B Dingwell; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Reprinted from The British Journal of Psychology (1958), 49, 182-194: Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals.

Authors:  James J Gibson
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2009-04

5.  Variation in trunk kinematics influences variation in step width during treadmill walking by older and younger adults.

Authors:  Christopher P Hurt; Noah Rosenblatt; Jeremy R Crenshaw; Mark D Grabiner
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Kinematic determinants of human locomotion.

Authors:  N A Borghese; L Bianchi; F Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Visual influence on human locomotion. Modulation to changes in optic flow.

Authors:  T Prokop; M Schubert; W Berger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Optic flow drives human visuo-locomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Hugo Bruggeman; Wendy Zosh; William H Warren
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Effects of perturbation magnitude on dynamic stability when walking in destabilizing environments.

Authors:  Emily H Sinitksi; Kevin Terry; Jason M Wilken; Jonathan B Dingwell
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Does visual feedback during walking result in similar improvements in trunk control for young and older healthy adults?

Authors:  Eric Anson; Russell Rosenberg; Peter Agada; Tim Kiemel; John Jeka
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  7 in total

1.  Vestibular Dysfunction after Subconcussive Head Impact.

Authors:  Sungjae Hwang; Lei Ma; Keisuke Kawata; Ryan Tierney; John J Jeka
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Trunk motion visual feedback during walking improves dynamic balance in older adults: Assessor blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eric Anson; Lei Ma; Tippawan Meetam; Elizabeth Thompson; Roshita Rathore; Victoria Dean; John Jeka
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Connectivity of the Cingulate Sulcus Visual Area (CSv) in Macaque Monkeys.

Authors:  V De Castro; A T Smith; A L Beer; C Leguen; N Vayssière; Y Héjja-Brichard; P Audurier; B R Cottereau; J B Durand
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Control of human gait stability through foot placement.

Authors:  Sjoerd M Bruijn; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Postural Changes During Exteroceptive Thin Plantar Stimulation: The Effect of Prolonged Use and Different Plantar Localizations.

Authors:  Marco Tramontano; Jacopo Piermaria; Giovanni Morone; Alice Reali; Martin Vergara; Federica Tamburella
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-13

6.  Neural Control of Balance During Walking.

Authors:  Hendrik Reimann; Tyler Fettrow; Elizabeth D Thompson; John J Jeka
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Can optical flow perturbations detect walking balance impairment in people with multiple sclerosis?

Authors:  Brian P Selgrade; Diane Meyer; Jacob J Sosnoff; Jason R Franz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.