Literature DB >> 11351018

Neural prostheses.

A Prochazka1, V K Mushahwar, D B McCreery.   

Abstract

Assuming that neural regeneration after spinal cord injury (SCI) will eventually become a clinical reality, functional recovery will probably remain incomplete. Assistive devices will therefore continue to play an important role in rehabilitation. Neural prostheses (NPs) are assistive devices that restore functions lost as a result of neural damage. NPs electrically stimulate nerves and are either external or implanted devices. Surface stimulators for muscle exercise are now commonplace in rehabilitation clinics and many homes. Regarding implantable NPs, since 1963 over 40 000 have been implanted to restore hearing, bladder control and respiration. Epidural spinal cord stimulators and deep brain stimulators are routinely implanted to control pain, spasticity, tremor and rigidity. Implantable NPs have also been developed to restore limb movements using electrodes tunnelled under the skin to muscles and nerves. Spinal cord microstimulation (SC[mu]stim) is under study as an alternative way of restoring movement and bladder control. Improvement in bladder and bowel function is a high priority for many SCI people. Sacral root stimulation to elicit bladder contraction is the current NP approach, but this usually requires dorsal rhizotomies to reduce reflex contractions of the external urethral sphincter. It is possible that the spinal centres coordinating the bladder-sphincter synergy could be activated with SC[mu]stim. Given the large and growing number of NPs in use or development, it is surprising how little is known about their long-term interactions with the nervous system. Physiological research will play an important role in elucidating the mechanisms underlying these interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11351018      PMCID: PMC2278603          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0099b.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  74 in total

1.  Spinal cord microstimulation generates functional limb movements in chronically implanted cats.

Authors:  V K Mushahwar; D F Collins; A Prochazka
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Sacral anterior root stimulation for bladder control: clinical results.

Authors:  H E van der Aa; E Alleman; A Nene; G Snoek
Journal:  Arch Physiol Biochem       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Selective activation of small motor axons by quasi-trapezoidal current pulses.

Authors:  Z P Fang; J T Mortimer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Responses to spinal microstimulation in the chronically spinalized rat and their relationship to spinal systems activated by low threshold cutaneous stimulation.

Authors:  M C Tresch; E Bizzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Urinary bladder control by electrical stimulation: review of electrical stimulation techniques in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  N J Rijkhoff; H Wijkstra; P E van Kerrebroeck; F M Debruyne
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  Location of bladder preganglionic neurons within the sacral parasympathetic nucleus of the cat.

Authors:  C Morgan; I Nadelhaft; W C de Groat
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Diaphragm pacing by radiofrequency transmission in the treatment of chronic ventilatory insufficiency. Present status.

Authors:  W W Glenn; W G Holcomb; J Hogan; I Matano; J B Gee; E K Motoyama; C S Kim; R S Poirier; G Forbes
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Organization of the sacral parasympathetic reflex pathways to the urinary bladder and large intestine.

Authors:  W C de Groat; I Nadelhaft; R J Milne; A M Booth; C Morgan; K Thor
Journal:  J Auton Nerv Syst       Date:  1981-04

9.  Axons from CNS neurons regenerate into PNS grafts.

Authors:  P M Richardson; U M McGuinness; A J Aguayo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-03-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Electrical stimulation of sacral roots for micturition after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  G H Creasey
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.241

View more
  20 in total

1.  Pharmacological aids to locomotor training after spinal injury in the cat.

Authors:  S Rossignol; N Giroux; C Chau; J Marcoux; E Brustein; T A Reader
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The effects of intraspinal microstimulation on spinal cord tissue in the rat.

Authors:  Jeremy A Bamford; Kathryn G Todd; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  [Status of the subretinal implant project. An overview].

Authors:  F Gekeler; E Zrenner
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  A lithographically-patterned, elastic multi-electrode array for surface stimulation of the spinal cord.

Authors:  Kathleen W Meacham; Richard J Giuly; Liang Guo; Shawn Hochman; Stephen P DeWeerth
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.838

5.  Laparoscopic implantation of neural electrodes on pelvic nerves: an experimental study on the obturator nerve in a chronic minipig model.

Authors:  Benoit Rabischong; Demetrio Larraín; Pierre Rabischong; Revaz Botchorishvili; Georges Fraisse; Stephane Gallego; Philippe Gaydier; Jean Michel Chardigny; Paul Avan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Neurophysiology and neural engineering: a review.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  An Active Learning Algorithm for Control of Epidural Electrostimulation.

Authors:  Jaehoon Choe; Parag Gad; Thomas A Desautels; Mandheerej S Nandra; Roland R Roy; Hui Zhong; Yu-Chong Tai; V Reggie Edgerton; Joel W Burdick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 8.  Intraspinal microstimulation for the recovery of function following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jeremy A Bamford; Vivian K Mushahwar
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Development of surrogate spinal cords for the evaluation of electrode arrays used in intraspinal implants.

Authors:  Cheng Cheng; Jonn Kmech; Vivian K Mushahwar; Anastasia L Elias
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Intraspinal microstimulation produces over-ground walking in anesthetized cats.

Authors:  B J Holinski; K A Mazurek; D G Everaert; A Toossi; A M Lucas-Osma; P Troyk; R Etienne-Cummings; R B Stein; V K Mushahwar
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.