Literature DB >> 25974925

An Active Learning Algorithm for Control of Epidural Electrostimulation.

Jaehoon Choe1, Parag Gad1, Thomas A Desautels2, Mandheerej S Nandra3, Roland R Roy1, Hui Zhong1, Yu-Chong Tai3, V Reggie Edgerton1, Joel W Burdick3.   

Abstract

Epidural electrostimulation has shown promise for spinal cord injury therapy. However, finding effective stimuli on the multi-electrode stimulating arrays employed requires a laborious manual search of a vast space for each patient. Widespread clinical application of these techniques would be greatly facilitated by an autonomous, algorithmic system which choses stimuli to simultaneously deliver effective therapy and explore this space. We propose a method based on GP-BUCB, a Gaussian process bandit algorithm. In n = 4 spinally transected rats, we implant epidural electrode arrays and examine the algorithm's performance in selecting bipolar stimuli to elicit specified muscle responses. These responses are compared with temporally interleaved intra-animal stimulus selections by a human expert. GP-BUCB successfully controlled the spinal electrostimulation preparation in 37 testing sessions, selecting 670 stimuli. These sessions included sustained autonomous operations (ten-session duration). Delivered performance with respect to the specified metric was as good as or better than that of the human expert. Despite receiving no information as to anatomically likely locations of effective stimuli, GP-BUCB also consistently discovered such a pattern. Further, GP-BUCB was able to extrapolate from previous sessions' results to make predictions about performance in new testing sessions, while remaining sufficiently flexible to capture temporal variability. These results provide validation for applying automated stimulus selection methods to the problem of spinal cord injury therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25974925      PMCID: PMC4617183          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2431911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  34 in total

Review 1.  Neural prostheses.

Authors:  A Prochazka; V K Mushahwar; D B McCreery
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Reducing muscle fatigue due to functional electrical stimulation using random modulation of stimulation parameters.

Authors:  Adam Thrasher; Geoffrey M Graham; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.094

3.  Spinal cord-transected mice learn to step in response to quipazine treatment and robotic training.

Authors:  Andy J Fong; Lance L Cai; Chad K Otoshi; David J Reinkensmeyer; Joel W Burdick; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Rehabilitative therapies after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  V Reggie Edgerton; Soo J Kim; Ronaldo M Ichiyama; Yuri P Gerasimenko; Roland R Roy
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Cheryl L Eiler; Brent Edwards
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults.

Authors:  T E Prieto; J B Myklebust; R G Hoffmann; E G Lovett; B M Myklebust
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Laufband locomotion with body weight support improved walking in persons with severe spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  A Wernig; S Müller
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1992-04

8.  Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Gregoire Courtine; Bingbing Song; Roland R Roy; Hui Zhong; Julia E Herrmann; Yan Ao; Jingwei Qi; V Reggie Edgerton; Michael V Sofroniew
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2008-01-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 9.  Spinal cord repair strategies: why do they work?

Authors:  Elizabeth J Bradbury; Stephen B McMahon
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Unsupervised adaptation of brain-machine interface decoders.

Authors:  Tayfun Gürel; Carsten Mehring
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.